Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Daily Low-Carb Support > Atkins Diet
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Thu, Apr-08-04, 08:05
woodpecker woodpecker is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 265
 
Plan: atkins
Stats: 185/180/165 Male 68 inches
BF:25
Progress: 25%
Location: Nova Scotia
Default CDC forgets to tell carbs the cause of obesity

The following tables show the change in consumption of macronutrients and total calories in the US between 1970 and 1994. It is clear to see that carbs increased (mainly grains and sugar), while fats (saturated) decreased (fish increased, but meat decreased in that group). Overall calories increased by 15%. This is a one-time only study. Other data since 1994 only shows yearly per capita consumption, but from that you can tell that a peak consumption of carbs was reached in the mid-1990s. Unfortunately there was no similar data for Canada that I could find. (If anyone knows of any please advise.) Canadian obesity rates in 2000 were about half the US, however, increasing rapidly. Probably the reason for that is less restaurant food as Canadians have less disposable income, rather than any other fitness or lifestyle differences. One more thing - CDC/FDA/USDA nutritionists knew this 10 years ago, but I guess they forgot to tell the public until now.

(If the tables don't show, read Table 1 as follows: meat fish and poultry - 0 grams of carbs in 1970 and 1994 and 38 grams of protein in 1970 increasing to 43 grams in 1994... and so on. Grams of carbohydrates from grain products increased from 134 to 199 over the period. Total carbohydrate consumption increased from 388 to 491 over the period. Table 2 shows that consumption of fats remained relatively constant. Other tables - not shown - indicate saturated fat consumption decreased, but vegetable oil consumption increased.)

Table 1
US Consumption of Major Nutrients By Food Group (Per Capita Per Day)
Years 1970 and 1994

Food Group
Carbohydrate (grams) Protein (grams)
1970 1994 1970 1994
Meat, Fish, Poultry
0 0 38 43
Dairy Products
25 23 20 21
Eggs
1 0 5 4
Fats and Oils
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Citrus Fruits
7 9 1 1
Other Fruits
17 22 1 1
Nuts/Legumes/Soy
9 10 5 7
White Potatoes
21 22 2 3
Green/Yell Veg.1/
3 3 N/A N/A
Other Vegetables
15 15 3 3
Grain Products
134 199 18 26
Sugars, Sweets
152 184 N/A N/A
Miscellaneous
4 4 1 1
Total
388 491 94 110

Notes: 1/ Includes broccoli, escarole/endive, bell peppers, spinach, carrots and sweet potatoes.
Source: USDA/Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion


Table 2
US Consumption of Major Nutrients By Food Group (Per Capita Per Day)
Years 1970 and 1994

Food Group
Fats (grams) Energy (Kilo-calories)
1970 1994 1970 1994
Meat, Fish, Poultry
53 39 650 540
Dairy Products
19 20 350 350
Eggs
4 3 60 50
Fats and Oils
66 83 580 740
Citrus Fruits
N/A N/A 30 40
Other Fruits
1 1 70 90
Nuts/Legumes/Soy
5 6 100 110
White Potatoes
N/A N/A 90 100
Green/Yell Veg.1/
N/A N/A 10 10
other Vegetables
1 1 70 70
Grain Products
2 4 640 950
Sugars, Sweets
0 0 590 690
Miscellaneous
3 4 40 50
Total *
*154 *161 3,300 3,800
Total **
**146 **148 3,300 3,800

Notes: 1/ Includes broccoli, escarole/endive, bell peppers, spinach, carrots and sweet potatoes.
Source: USDA/Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion: * Table 42; ** Table 43 (presents conflicting data).

Last edited by woodpecker : Thu, Apr-08-04 at 11:37.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Thu, Apr-08-04, 08:51
cc48510 cc48510 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,018
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 320/220/195 Male 6'0"
BF:
Progress: 80%
Location: Pensacola, FL
Default

The accuracy of the data would depened on the method used to determine intakes. For example, "disappearance" data tends to overestimate food consumption, especially Fat. Disappearance Data is derived by taking how much food is produced and subtracting what we know know was used Industrally, in Gov't Feedlots, and what remained unsold at the end of the year. Unfortunately, it fails to account for waste, using foods for purposes other than food, spoilage, feeding human food to animals, and such. LF Advocates sometimes try to use disappearance data to say that we are eating more fat than we were in 1970.

The data does show a 3% rise in fat disappearance, but it says right at the beginning that fat wasting has increased 6%...and that's a conservative estimate. Some estimates are even higher. It also shows significant rises in Fruit and Vegetable Disappearance. While Potatoes, Corn (not a veggie,) and Fruit Juices make up a portion of this figure...a good portion is other fruits and veggies, especially Grapes and Bananas. Frozen Berry disappearance has slightly decreased. I wonder how much of the increase in Fruits and Veggies is attributable to increased spoilage and/or waste...

The most dramatic part it shows is the change in Sugars...especially HFCS. Disappearance of HFCS has risen 15,500% since 1970...from 1/2 pound a year to 62.4 pounds a year. To put that in perspective, the Average American in 1970, consumed <1g of HFCS (dry weight) a day, while the average American today consumes 77.6g (dry weight) EVERY DAY. On an side note, the chart includes two types of HFCS: 42 and 55. I assume that refers to the percentage of Fructose. In 1970, the consumption of HFCS-42 was <1g a day, and HFCS-55 was ZERO. Today, we consume 29.5g of HFCS-42 and 48.1g of HFCS-55 per day. Since HFCS is used primarily by packaged food makers, and has an indefinite shelf life, waste, spoilage, and other non-food uses are minimal.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What if It's All Been a Big Fat Lie? deelight_99 LC Research/Media 70 Mon, Jul-09-18 07:16
US News: "Rethinking Weight" gotbeer LC Research/Media 4 Tue, Feb-03-04 14:50
Current and Potential Drugs for Treatment of Obesity-Endocrine Reviews Voyajer LC Research/Media 0 Mon, Jul-15-02 18:57
New York Times Atkid LC Research/Media 3 Mon, Jul-08-02 03:05
New York Times article, 7/7/02 destro LC Research/Media 1 Sat, Jul-06-02 17:59


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:15.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.