Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Sat, Nov-29-03, 10:00
bvtaylor's Avatar
bvtaylor bvtaylor is offline
There and Back Again
Posts: 1,590
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 200/194.4/140 Female 5'3"
BF:42%/42%/20%
Progress: 9%
Location: Northern Colorado
Default Dangers of Sucralose / Splenda?

The Potential Dangers of Sucralose

http://www.mercola.com/2000/dec/3/sucralose_dangers.htm

There's a new artificial sweetener on the block and it is already in a wide range of products (CLICK HERE to see list), some even sold in health food stores and manufactured by nutritionally-oriented companies. But is it proven safe? Does it provide any benefit to the public? Does it help with weight loss? Are there any long term human studies? Has it been shown to be safe for the environment? The answer to all of these questions is unfortunately a resounding NO.

The artificial sweetener sucralose, which is sold under the name Splenda™, is one of the up-and-coming "next generation" of high-intensity sugar substitutes. It is non-caloric and about 600 times sweeter than sucrose (white table sugar), although it can vary from 320 tp 1,000 times sweeter, depending on the food application. The white crystalline powder tastes like a lot like sugar, but is more intense in its sweetness.

How it is Manufactured

Sucralose is produced by chlorinating sugar (sucrose). This involves chemically changing the structure of the sugar molecules by substituting three chlorine atoms for three hydroxyl groups.

History

Sucralose was discovered in 1976 by researchers working under the auspices of Tate & Lyle Ltd., a large British sugar refiner. In 1980, Tate & Lyle arranged with Johnson & Johnson, the world's largest health care company, to develop sucralose. Johnson & Johnson formed McNeil Speciality Products Company in 1980 to commercialize sucralose.

In 1991, Canada became the first nation to approve the use of sucralose.

In April, 1998 the US Food and Drug Administration granted approval for sucralose to be used in a variety of food products (CLICK HERE for complete list of products using sucralose). Diet RC cola was the first US product with sucralose, introduced in May 1998.

Sucralose is not yet approved for use in most European countries, where it is still under review.

Safety Concerns

Few human studies of safety have been published on sucralose. One small study of diabetic patients using the sweetener showed a statistically significant increase in glycosylated hemoglobin (Hba1C), which is a marker of long-term blood glucose levels and is used to assess glycemic control in diabetic patients. According to the FDA, "increases in glycosolation in hemoglobin imply lessening of control of diabetes.

Research in animals has shown that sucralose can cause many problems in rats, mice, and rabbits, such as:

Shrunken thymus glands (up to 40% shrinkage)

Enlarged liver and kidneys.

Atrophy of lymph follicles in the spleen and thymus

Increased cecal weight

Reduced growth rate

Decreased red blood cell count

Hyperplasia of the pelvis

Extension of the pregnancy period

Aborted pregnancy

Decreased fetal body weights and placental weights

Diarrhea

According to one source (Sucralose Toxicity Information Center), concerning the significant reduction in size of the thymus gland, "the manufacturer claimed that the sucralose was unpleasant for the rodents to eat in large doses and that starvation caused the shruken thymus glands.

[Toxicologist Judith] Bellin reviewed studies on rats starved under experimental conditions, and concluded that their growth rate could be reduced by as much as a third without the thymus losing a significant amount of weight (less than 7 percent). The changes were much more marked in rats fed on sucralose. While the animals' growth rate was reduced by between 7 and 20 percent, their thymuses shrank by as much as 40 percent. (New Scientist 23 Nov 1991, pg 13)"

A compound chemically related to sucrose, 6-chloro-deoxyglucose, is known to have anti-fertility and neurotoxic effects, although animal studies of sucralose have not shown these effects.

According to the FDA's "Final Rule" report, "Sucralose was weakly mutagenic in a mouse lymphoma mutation assay." The FDA aslo reported many other tests as having "inconclusive" results.

Just how few studies currently exist on sucralose is an issue. Endurance News provides the following table illustrating this fact:

Sweetener # of Studies*

Saccharin 2374

Aspartame 598

Cyclamates 459

Acesulfame-K 28

Sucralose 19

*Number of studies determined by MEDLINE search.

In terms of safety, it is not just the original substance (sucralose) that one needs to worry about. As the FDA notes, "Because sucralose may hydrolyze in some food products...the resulting hydrolysis products may also be ingested by the consumer."

Is There Any Long-Term Human Research?

None. According to the Medical Letter on Drugs & Therapeutics, "Its long-term safety is unknown." According to the Sucralose Toxicity Information Center, the "Manufacturer's '100's of studies' (some of which show hazards) were clearly inadequate and do not demonstrate safety in long-term use."

Is Sucralose Absorbed or Metabolized?

Despite the manufacturer's claims to the contrary, sucralose is significantly absorbed and metabolized by the body. According to the FDA's "Final Rule" report, 11% to 27% of sucralose is absorbed in humans, and the rest is excreted unchanged in feces. According to the Japanese Food Sanitation Council, as much as 40% of ingested sucralose is absorbed.

Plasma sucralose has been reported to have a half-life of anywhere from 2 to 5 hours in most studies, although the half-life in rabbits was found to be much longer at about 36 hours.

About 20% to 30% of absorbed sucralose is metabolized. Both the metabolites and unchanged absorbed sucralose are excreted in urine. The absorbed sucralose has been found to concentrate in the liver, kidney, and gastrointestinal tract. According to The Sucralose Toxicity Information Center, sucralose is broken down "into small amounts of 1,6-dichlorofructose, a chemical which has not been adequtely tested in humans."

Chlorinated Pesticides

According to Consumers Research Magazine "Some concern was raised about sucralose being a chlorinated molecule. Some chlorinated molecules serve as the basis for pesticides such as D.D.T., and accumulate in body fat. However, Johnson & Johnson emphasized that sucralose passes through the body unabsorbed."

Of course, this assertion about not being absorbed is complete nonsense. As shown above, a substantial amount of sucralose is absorbed, so the argument is not valid.

According to the HAD, "The manufacturer claims that the chlorine added to sucralose is similar to the chlorine atom in the salt (NaCl) molecule. That is not the case. Sucralose may be more like ingesting tiny amounts of chlorinated pesticides, but we will never know without long-term, independent human research."

Contaminants

The FDA acknowledges that sucralose "is produced at an approximate purity of 98%." While that may sound pretty pure, just what is in that other 2%? It turns out that the final sucralose product contains small amounts of potentially dangerous substances such as:

Heavy Metals (e.g., Lead)

Arsenic

Triphenilphosphine Oxide

Methanol

Chlorinated Disaccharides

Chlorinated Monosaccharide

Although manufacturing guidelines do specify limits on these substances there is no guarantee that such limits will always be met.

Environmental Concerns

Despite the fact that a portion of sucralose is metabolized into some chemicals of questionable safety, a majory of the consumed sucralose is excreted unchanged in the feces and urine. While that may be good for the person using the product, it may not be so great for the environment.

Although sucralose is being flushed down toilets wherever sucralose is approved for sale, what happens to it next is simply a matter for speculation. I know of no studies showing what happens to the chemical when the raw sewage is treated and then released back into the environment.

Does it remain stabile or react with other substances to form new compounds?

Is the sucralose or any resulting chemicals safe for the environment?

How will this chemical affect aquatic life such as fish, as well as other animals?

Will sucralose begin to appear in our water supplies, just as some drugs are beginning to be found.

Of course, we will likely not know the answers to these questions for many years, if at all. One of the main reasons for this is that the FDA did not require an Environmental Impact Statement for sucralose, because in their words, "the action will not have a significant impact on the human environment."

One study did find that sucralose is metabolized by microrganisms in both the water and soil (Labare 94). However, the ecological impact of this new chemical being introduced into the environment is unknown.

Is There a Benefit for Consumers?

According to Consumers' Research Magazine, sucralose provides some benefits for the corporations making and using it, but not for consumers. They state:

But are such foods truly beneficial and desirable? Diabetics, weight watchers, and the general public might make better food choices by selecting basic, rather than highly processed foods; for example, apples, rather than turnovers; or plain, rather than sweetened, dairy foods.

They note that non-caloric artificial sweeteners are not replacing, but rather supplementing conventional sweeteners. They note that as of 1990 Americans were consuming an average of 20 pounds (sugar sweetness equivalency) of artificial sweeteners, and as consumption of sugar-substitutes has risen so too has consumption of sugar.

Does Sucralose Help with Weight Loss?

According to Consumers' Research Magazine "There is no clear-cut evidence that sugar substitutes are useful in weight reduction. On the contrary, there is some evidence that these substances may stimulate appetite."

Where is Sucralose Found?

In the United States, the FDA has granted approval for the use of sucralose in 15 food and beverage categories: (For a complete list of products containing sucralose CLICK HERE)

Baked goods and baking mixes

Chewing gum

Confections and frostings

Fats and oils (salad dressings)

Fruit and water ices

Jams and jellies

Processed fruits and fruit juices

Sweet sauces, toppings and syrups

Beverages and beverage bases

Coffee and tea

Dairy product analogs

Frozen dairy desserts and mixes

Gelatins, puddings and fillings

Milk products

Sugar substitutes

For a complete list of products containing sucralose CLICK HERE

Comparison to Other Sweeteners

Its promoters cite several benefits over other sweeteners, such as:

Unlike saccharin, sucralose leaves no bitter aftertaste.

Unlike other artificial sweeteners, it remains stable at high temperatures.

Unlike sugar, it does not raise blood glucose levels

As a comparison to sucralose's 600-fold sweetness increase over sugar, consider the other artificial sweeteners on the market:

Saccharin (Sweet-and -Low) - 300 to 500 times sweeter

Aspartame (NutraSweet and Equal) - 150 to 200 times sweeter

Acesulfame K (Sunette) - 200 times sweeter.

Big Business

A 1998 report in Chemical Week states that the high-intensity sweetener market is about $1.5-billion/year. About 70%-80% of that market is made up of soft drink sweeteners, of which aspartame has a near monopoly. They note that although sucralose is 50% sweeter than aspartame, it will be difficult to persuade many soft drink producers to give up NutraSweet (aspartame) since it is widely accepted by consumers.

Is Anyone Monitoring Post-Approval Reactions?

Apparently not. With no established system for monitoring and tracking post-approval adverse effects, how can it ever be established whether large-scale and long-term consumption of sucralose is safe?

Technical Information

Sucralose is made from sucrose by substituting three chlorine atoms for three hydroxyl groups to yield 1,6-dichloro-1,6-dideoxy-BETA-D-fructofuranosyl-4-chloro-4-deoxy-alpha-D-galactopyranoside. This is accomplished in a five-step process.

Prolonged storage, particularly at high temperatures and low pH, causes the sucralose to break down into 4-chloro-4-deoxy-galactose (4CG) and 1,6-dichloro-1,6-dideoxyfructose (1,6 DCF),

The Chemical Abstracts Service Registry number (CAS Reg. No.) for sucralose is 56038-13-2.

Science Behind Sucralose Toxicity

Here are some of the specific biochemical reasons why you will want to give serious consideration to consuming sucralose.

Much of the concern is related to the fact that the manufacturer of sucralose claims that it is derived from sugar that contains the monosaccharide sucrose.

Look at the chemical name of sucralose: 1,6-Dichloro-1,6-dideoxy-beta-D-fructofuranosyl-4-chloro-4-deoxy-alpha-D-galactopyranoside. One would have expected that a product "made form sugar" as they say on the box, would be called: 1,6-Dichloro-1,6-dideoxy-beta-D-fructofuranosyl-4-chloro-4-deoxy-alpha-D-glucopyranoside.

Why does this molecule contain a chlorinated galactose moiety rather than a chlorinated glucose moiety if it is made from sucrose? When the molecule is hydrolyzed, chlorinated monosaccharides are produced from the product. Could it be that sucrose is not used due to the toxicity of chlorinated glucose?

Should Sucralose be Avoided?

The Holistic Medicine Web Page cites the following reasons to avoid sucralose:

Pre-approval tests indicated potential toxicity of sucralose.

There are no *independent* controlled human studies on sucralose (similar to 15 years ago for aspartame).

There are no long-term (12-24 months) human studies of sucralose's effects.

There is no monitoring of health effects. It took government agencies decades to agree that there were countless thousands of deaths from tobacco. Why? Simply because there had been no monitoring or epidemiological studies. Without such monitoring and studies, huge effects can easily go unnoticed.

Do Products with Sucralose Carry Any Warning Labels Or Information Statements?

No. The regulatory agencies and scientific review bodies that have endorsed the safety of sucralose have not required any warning information to be placed on the labels of products sweetened with sucralose.

Conclusions

The Sucralose Toxicity Information Center concludes that:

While it is unlikely that sucralose is as toxic as the poisoning people are experiencing from Monsanato's aspartame, it is clear from the hazards seen in pre-approval research and from its chemical structure that years or decades of use may contribute to serious chronic immunological or neurological disorders.

The Consumer's Research Magazine concludes that:

As Americans continue to choose ever-increasing amounts of such foods and beverages, sweeteners may soar to higher consumption levels. The long-range health effects from such escalation need careful evaluation. Do additional approved sweetening agents truly contribute to good health? Do they really meet special dietary needs? Or, do they merely further encourage poor dietary choices?



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Recent Examples of What Splenda Can Do To You

Dear Dr. Mercola,

I wanted to thank you for posting your article regarding sucralose, and to inform you of my reaction to eating it today.

I bought a low-carb bar called "Ultimate Lo Carb" by Biochem at a local health food store. I have been eating foods low in starchy carbs and thought this might be a good snack bar. Well, almost immediately after eating eat I became nauseous. Then my stomach starting cramping and I began dry heaving.

I wondered what could have caused this and decided to try and read the label. The only ingredient I did not recognize was "sucralose".

So, I jumped on the internet and did a search for it and found your article. In the meantime I was heaving and feeling even worse. Well, I am allergic to chlorine, as well as having a liver that doesn't function very well (I take a natural supplement called "Lipogen" for liver support as prescribed by my ND), and when I saw what you had to say about sucralose, I figured that was what was causing it.

I kept feeling worse, and I decided I needed to get it out of my system and took some ipecac (maybe not the best move, but the only thing I could think of). By the time the syrup got into my stomach the heaving was getting worse and intestinal distress was setting in. It was like eating bad seafood. I nearly died of food poisoning by crab legs a number of years back, and this was the closest thing to that feeling.

Finally everything in my system started coming out, and my body didn't stop until my entire digestive tract was cleared out. I have never reacted this violently to anything I have eaten except for when I have had food poisoning.

Something needs to be done to get this product off the market.

I can't help but be convinced that the FDA takes payoffs. No ethical person could approve the use of things like MSG (another thing I cannot tolerate eating), which is classified by the FDA as an excitotoxin and is known to be harmful to the central nervous system. I will do everything to get people to read your article and get the word out on the FDA's latest blunder.

Best,

Shelley Flis



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Dr. Mercola,

THANK YOU so much for your informative site! I am currently "detoxing" from using sucralose after a terrible reaction. It all began with purchasing a box of Splenda. The changes (in my opinion) were subtle.

However, my family and friends noticed immediately. I became withdrawn and disinterested in my usual hobbies. Everything became a "chore." I was tired during the day, but couldn't sleep at night either. I play flute which requires a quick mental process and fingering skills to match but suddenly I was struggling to play. Typing is difficult, as well.

During the past three weeks I noticed myself "zoning out." I'd become forgetful and moody. I thought perhaps it was the Splenda, because that was the only thing different in my daily habits.

I quickly dismissed the thought - despite having experienced a similar situation with Equal a few years back. I called it "Jekyl v. Hyde Syndrome." But it seemed I noticed the changes much quicker with Equal than with Splenda.

I really suffered yesterday. I was an emotional wreck. I cried and cried. I felt like I was losing my mind. My husband and son discussed my disturbing behavior while I was in the shower. Our son, Tim, recalled that the changes began with that little yellow box. Steve, (my husband,) mentioned it to me. Little by little, things fell into place, including the unexplainable accident I recently had in our truck.

I had just stopped at a stop sign and the trooper said that I couldn't have been going over 15 miles an hour when I nearly rolled our truck. Even he said that I narrowly escaped injury. I nearly had a second accident last week.

My senses had become SO dulled, I could barely function.

I could not focus on anything. Even playing my flute was so hard. I normally stand to play, but for the past two weeks at practice, I sat a lot. I felt "dazed."

This morning, I feel MUCH better than I have in the recent weeks. Not quite "normal," but much better. Even the acne (on my otherwise clear skin) is fading away. Yep! I had a patch of acne, which appeared when I began using Splenda!

How many people are suffering from what appears to be diseases - or even acne, when it is simply a reaction to a chemical they are ingesting? If companies were forced to list the ingredients of these products, such as arsenic, they'd sure be a lot more careful! I mean, who would intentionally poison themselves?

Sincerely,

Debby Fazekas



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Dr. Mercola,

Four years ago I began to have panic attacks and was on BuSpar for about a year. I started reading about aspartame and consumed the product daily -- mostly in diet drinks and was a big consumer of Diet Rite. After learning about problems other people were having I quit completely consuming the stuff. And have been panic free for 3 years.

In December I started using splenda and at the same time started having a great deal of anxiety and had a couple of panic attacks but didn't think about the link of Splenda and the anxiety until about a week ago. I also had my mom visiting and introduced her to Splenda -- guess what -- she started having panic attacks during her visit and actually cut her visit short due to her feeling bad.

I haven't consumed anymore of it for a week but am still having problems. Oh, I also was having an irregular heart beat which I did see my doctor about. He assured me that my blood pressure was excellent and cholesterol also good and I shouldn't worry about my heart.

I consume very little to no caffine. Local doctors don't put much faith in the idea that Nutra Sweet caused problems. I'm sure my new theory about Splenda would carry even less weight. By the way, I have a very stess-free life-style. I run my own little business and set my own hours. I don't believe my environment is causing any irregular stress.

Sue



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I found this website while researching the new sweetener SPLENDA, a sweetener

included in the DIET ICE BOTANICALS drink made by Talking Rain Beverage Co., Preston WA. 98050 Ph. 1-800-734-0748, WWW.TALINGRAIN.COM, currently sold at SAMS warehouse club.

The shocking thing I read at the end of your article on this is the Food Poisoning like symptoms. I've probably drank about 30 -16oz bottles of the stuff, which supposedly contains St, Johns Wort, Kava-Kava, and Ginseng, among other "good" things for you. My son has been sneaking a few bottles to past Mom, despite my apprehension.

We both came down with a similar food poisoning which lasted nearly 10 days for him, and is going on day 3 for me, and I'm throwing the stuff out today.

Thanks for your information,



x6rj~bellsouth.net



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Dr. Mercola:

Thank you so much for your webpage. I recently drank my first bottle of Virgin Diet Cola, and experienced a mind-numbing headache. I was literally seeing spots. I read the label, thinking there must be something crazy in the cola. The one ingredient I didn't recognize was "Sucralose." My husband, a doctor, said he'd never heard of the ingredient either.

After having read your site, I've cleaned my cupboards of Pure Protein bars, which I had no idea contained this deadly chemical, and, needless to say, will NOT be purchasing any of the other products you've listed. Thank you for your thorough research and intelligent, accessible data.

Best -- Megyn Cotner



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dr. Mercola,

I was horrified to read some of the letters on your website. I was excited at first to find an artificial sweetener that did not give me Migraines like Aspartame (which also caused some depression). Although I did not use it a lot, after about 6 months of OCCASIONAL use, I detected a pattern in my Splenda use and severe altered emotional state. I became irate, impatient, hyper-sensitive to noise, clutter and children. I really thought this was a mental breakdown, or spiritual attack of some sort. These episodes only came periodically, but they really scared me. Then I noticed a pattern - use of sucralose, followed in hours (or the next morning) by one of these events (lasting 3 to 5 hours). What a relief! I'm not really going nuts - and I can fix this, by never using the product again. What really upsets me is that how many people are suffering and will NEVER make any connection.

How many doctors are treating these people with anti-depressants? How many body-conscious teenagers are committing suicide because of this severe alteration of emotional function? I realize that not all people have the same symptoms, but I would really like to join a support group, or get involved in a chat room or join a campaign and GET THE INFORMATION OUT!!!

I also would be interested in knowing if there is any information on exactly what component of Sucralose affects the brain/nervous system and causes altered emotional states.

Thank you,

Lugene Azar



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I was looking up the sweetener Sucralose which is in ACTII kettle corn. I was trying to find out if it was the same as nutra sweet or aspertine. Whenever I eat anything that has that in it, I get pains in my leg and knee. I can not sleep because of the pain, it hurts to walk up the stairs and so on. The pain will go away when I stop eating anything with that in it, within one to two weeks. I had a friend who got pain all over her body after drinking diet soda.

Thanks,

Elizabeth Romel



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I wish to share with the medical field the terrible reations I experienced after eating the product "splenda" .

I do not know who to tell, but I do feel it is important.

I am not diabetic; however, I had two good friends come to dinner, and they brought this big "yellow box of Splenda"...my life, my health was so messed up for the next week I didn't know what was wrong.

I am healthy. I am 44, in great health, 125 pounds, no medicine presc. at all...and yet the morning after I ate this product "Splenda" I was in terrible, terrible pain.

I only ate it, because I cooked two pies for my diabetic friends.

The next 6 days were full of such excruciating pain, I hated to have to go to a doctor but I had to. I cried, the pain in my chest hurt so much.

I want someone that is doing research on this product to understand it really can hurt healthy people, without their knowing it.

I thought I had a heart problem. Forturnately it was a reaction to this product; yet the doctor I saw that ran all kinds of tests, never asked me if I had "ate" anything new!!!!

If I can provide you with anything else I would be pleased to; I don't want anyone else to have to experience the terrible pain in the chest that I did. It was "EXCRUCIATING"...no doubt about it.

Cynthia Nelson



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You can add me to the list of people who have had a bad experience with sucralose. I purchased and ate a bag of jelly beans yesterday afternoon.

No carbs sounded wonderful, and they really did taste great, so I grabbed another bag on my way home

Unfortunately, a couple of hours later, I started experiencing food poisoning-like symptoms. It was clear to me that my system is trying to rid itself of something, so I looked at the packaging of the only thing I ate last night and found your web page. I was up all night and my normally flat and trim tummy is distended to the point that, when I lay on my back, I look seven months' pregnant!

I am grateful I now know what is causing my discomfort -- I will definitely avoid this product at all costs when shopping for my family!! Thank you for an informative article!!

Karen

Fort Lauderdale



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Doctor Mercola,

I'm not expecting an answer to my email, however I do want to say thank you. After reading your site I am certain now that I was poisoned by Splenda. I knew I was poisoned and I knew it wasn't "food poisoning" from a bacteria. The pain in my body was definitely neurological. I am still experiencing some of the pain and am flushing my Splenda down the drain today. The pain was excruciating, in every part of my body. I am a nurse and I knew instantly that I was experiencing neurological symptoms. I had diarrhea for 3 days also. I came very close to calling 911. I am a 53 year old female in excellent health. These symptoms hit me like a brick very quickly. My blood pressure sky rocketed and I almost fell on my face in a parking lot. I'm on my way now to whole foods to purchase some granular vitamin c to detoxify my body. You saved my life. Thank you again for your information.

Sincerely,

Gypsie Mahrou, RN

Houston, Texas



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hello,

I've just been reading up on sucralose because I realized just this past week that I've been having a bad reaction to a product I've been using since December - Splenda. I started using Splenda in my coffed and tea since late December and shortly after I began itching in various place on my body and bright red rashed and welts appeared as well. It seemed to be the worst in the evening and only a little in the day. I didn't relate it to the Splenda at all, but I had my coffed in the morning, two cups, the second I rarely finished, and I would have two to three cups of hot tea in the evenings. I finally saw my doctor in March and after seeing my rash and how badly I itched and hearing what I discribed, he told me that I was allergic to something I was ingesting. I still didn't put it together, at least I didn't want to.

I knew that Splenda was the only thing I had changed and had still been using since the itching started, but I didn't want to go back to sugar and the other substitutes weren't options for me because of the aspertame. Splenda "had" to be alright since it was made from sugar, I thought. The doctor put me on some medication to stop the itching and clear up the rash. While I took it for a week and½, the itching stopped. The rash would still be visible, but now it just looked sort of like it was underlying the skin, as if it were just dormat. Two weeks after my first doctor visit, I had a follow-up and the doctor said I looked fine and to see him again in three months just to make sure, unless, of course, it started again.

Well, it did start again, that very night, in fact. I itched and itched. I waited a few days, but the itching got so bad, I took some of the medication that I still had, since I hadn't used it up. I would just take it at night so I could sleep and then only every two or three days so the pills would last until I could get to the doctor again. The rash would still appear and it would be that very bright red color, different size spots and some odd shapes as well. Sometimes I would get streaks. One day last week I had two streaks going up my neck side by side, each almost as wide as my finger and at the base of my neck a large red splotch.

Wednesday night the itching was terrible again and I finally gave in to the inescapable fact that Splenda had to be the root of this problem, so I stopped using it in my tea that night, and have not used it in anything since. I have still had the rash appear periodically as before, but not as often and not so bright red, no welts appear, and I have not been itching nearly as much or as badly. I'm guessing that it may take time for the stuff to get out of my system completely. I guess I am writing this to you to have my experience with Sucralose documented in some way, even if it's just an email. I would love to know, though, if you know of anyone else who has had a similar experience. Thank you for taking the time to read this.

Marcia



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I just want to thank you guys, as without your Web site I'd be in the mental ward right now! I'm a big coffee drinker, but my family has a history of diabetes so I decided I should cut out the sugar I add to my coffee.

Well, I switched to using Splenda in my coffee about two months ago. Now I’m no wimp, and I’m not a health nut or anything like that! I’m a former football player, a vice president with a major banking institution and kind of a tough guy. Let me put it this way--the last time I cried was when the Green Bay Packers won the Superbowl!

So, anyway, I was using Splenda and I started getting withdrawn, had trouble focusing, and started to have problems with frustration. Gradually, I became more and more depressed. I thought it was stress or my job, something like that.

Well, last Thursday I completely fell apart! My girlfriend came over and found me crying uncontrollably for no reason, and all I could say was, "I'll be OK." She couldn’t get me to move, she couldn’t talk me down and I could not tell her what was wrong!

She was shocked as I had never done anything even remotely like this before and so she made me go to the hospital. The doctors there we so concerned about my condition they wanted to check me into the mental-health ward.

Being the way I am I refused but agreed to come back the next day and see a psychiatrist, which I did and he put me on a huge dose of Effexor. That night I was on the Web and for some unknown reason I did a search for Splenda and found the www.mercola.com Web site.

When I read your information on Splenda I was shocked--I simply had no clue! I am now 99.9 percent convinced that my mental health issues were a direct result of using Splenda. I even had the stomach cramps and chest pains that other people have mentioned after using Splenda, but I dismissed them as panic attacks and stress.

So the next morning I got up and had some more Splenda and, low and behold, I started feeling the symptoms of a deepening depression again! It was clearly due to the Splenda, so I tossed it out.

I just want to say thank you. I would love to help get this product off the market! By the way, I missed work because of my ordeal, so I had to tell my boss about my problems and now I have to explain to him that I’m not nuts or having a break down--how embarrassing!

Thanks again!

Steve G.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DR. MERCOLA'S COMMENT:

Don't let these large companies fool you. There is no magic alternative to sugar when it comes to sweeteners. You simply can not have your cake and eat it too when it comes to this area. It is far too early to tell, as not enough people have consumed this product to observe large numbers of adverse effects.









However, I have had a number of patients in our Wellness Center who have had some severe migraines and even seizures possibly from consuming this product.

My advice?

AVOID Sucralose.

I am fond of telling people that if something tastes sweet you probably should spit it out as it is not likely to be to good for you. This of course, is a humorous exaggeration, but for most people who struggle with chronic illness, it is likely to be a helpful guide.

PLEASE note this article is being written in 2000. This is one of the first comprehensive clear investigative reports and warnings on sucralose on the Internet.

Related Articles:



The Dangers of Chlorine and Issues With Sucralose



Sources:

Food and Drug Administration "Final Rule " for Sucralose, 21 CFR Part 172, Docket No. 87F-0086.

Lord GH, Newberne PM. Renal mineralization -- a ubiquitous lesion in chronic rat studies. Food Chem Toxicol 1990 Jun;28:449-55.

Labare MP, Alexander M. Microbial cometabolism of sucralose, a chlorinated disaccharide, in environmental samples. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1994 Oct;42:173-8.

Hunter BT. Sucralose. Consumers' Research Magazine, Oct90, Vol. 73 Issue 10, p8, 2p.

Maudlin RK. FDA approves sucralose for expanded use. Modern Medicine, Oct99, Vol. 67 Issue 10, p57, 1/9p

Sucralose -- a new artificial sweetener. Medical Letter on Drugs & Therapeutics, 07/03/98, Vol. 40, Issue 1030, p67, 2p.

Q&A: Is newly FDA approved sweetener sucralose good for you? Executive Health's Good Health Report, Nov98, Vol. 35 Issue 2, p6, 1p, 1c.

Gain B. FDA approves J&J Sweetener. Chemical Week, 04/15/98, Vol. 160 Issue 14, p27, 1/4p.

Sucralose Toxicity Information Center

Splenda Product Web Site

Official Tate & Lyle Sucralose Web Site

Endurance News, Issue 26.


Last edited by bvtaylor : Sat, Nov-29-03 at 10:02.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Sat, Nov-29-03, 10:17
bvtaylor's Avatar
bvtaylor bvtaylor is offline
There and Back Again
Posts: 1,590
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 200/194.4/140 Female 5'3"
BF:42%/42%/20%
Progress: 9%
Location: Northern Colorado
Default

One quick note... a lot of the letters to the doctor about the horrors of Splenda did not mention if there were sugar alcohols in the products as well. Sucralose as a stand-alone sweetner is used less than it is in combination with other sweetners, particularly maltitol and acesulfame-K.
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Sat, Nov-29-03, 16:49
Kristine's Avatar
Kristine Kristine is offline
Forum Moderator
Posts: 26,176
 
Plan: Primal/P:E
Stats: 171/145/145 Female 5'7"
BF:
Progress: 100%
Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
Default

I really dislike Dr Mercola's style of taking self-diagnosis and anecdotes and trying to scare people with them. He uses the long chemical nomenclature of sucralose as a reason to fear it. A high school chemistry student would understand that that's just a scare tactic: would you panic if you found out that you ingested 2-methyl-3-hydroxy-4,5-bis(hydroxy-methyl)pyridine? Don't - because that's just vitamin B6. I find it hard to take people seriously when they write like that.

Any artificial substance carries with it some risk that you might react to it unfavorably - heck, even natural products carry that risk. Most of us know someone who could die from eating peanuts. I'm no Splenda apologist, but if you were to eat Dr Mercola's way, you'd practically have to grow your own vegetables, shoot your own animals, and never eat anything else. I'll take my chances with Splenda over sugar and almost-certain diabetes.

Last edited by Kristine : Sat, Nov-29-03 at 16:59.
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Sat, Nov-29-03, 18:05
Samuel Samuel is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 1,200
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 200/176/176 Male 5' 8"
BF:
Progress: 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kristine
I really dislike Dr Mercola's style of taking self-diagnosis and anecdotes and trying to scare people with them.

I agree. I use splenda alot and have no problem. Before that, I have been using neutrasweet and never had a problem. Before using the two, I have been using saccharin and also never had a problem.

If there is something we should stay away from, it must be SUGAR.
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Sat, Nov-29-03, 18:24
Lisa N's Avatar
Lisa N Lisa N is offline
Posts: 12,028
 
Plan: Bernstein Diabetes Soluti
Stats: 260/-/145 Female 5' 3"
BF:
Progress: 63%
Location: Michigan
Default

Quote:
would you panic if you found out that you ingested 2-methyl-3-hydroxy-4,5-bis(hydroxy-methyl)pyridine? Don't - because that's just vitamin B6.


LOL...if people read the chemical name for water and were that easily frightened by chemical nomenclature, they'd never drink it!
I've used Splenda since it became available to the public and haven't had a problem with it, nor has any member of my family. Any time you have a product that's been tinkered with chemically, there is a small risk that a portion of the public will react to it in a negative way. For example, there are a host of medications that cause allergic reactions in people, but nobody is screaming for them to be taken off the market because of it simply because the benefit to those that don't have a problem with it is greater than the problem for those that do. If you know that you react badly to something, the solution is simple...don't put it in your body.
Something else that was pointed out in an earlier thread regarding all those letters is note how similar all the writing styles are...suspiciously so. Makes me wonder if they're real letters myself.
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Sun, Nov-30-03, 13:33
PaulaB PaulaB is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 49
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 222/165/133 Female 64
BF:
Progress: 64%
Location: United Kingdom
Default

The only reason I avoid the sweetner aspartane for example is the horrible taste it leaves behind in your mouth.
Reply With Quote
  #7   ^
Old Mon, Dec-01-03, 10:05
bcadieux's Avatar
bcadieux bcadieux is offline
Contributing Member
Posts: 234
 
Plan: atkins-OWL
Stats: 201/162.3/150 Female 5' 8"
BF:
Progress: 76%
Location: Chicago
Default

A lot of people will have adverse reactions to different things. I was taking Zyrtec for allergies and 3 days later I was suicidal. No one could figure out what happened to me because that is NOT me. The zyrtec was the only thing different in my life so I stopped it and was after a day or two was my old self.
I use splenda, sweet n low, stevia, and keto sweet. No bad reactions.
Reply With Quote
  #8   ^
Old Tue, Dec-02-03, 10:18
Hellistile's Avatar
Hellistile Hellistile is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,540
 
Plan: Animal-based/IF
Stats: 252/215.6/130 Female 5'4
BF:
Progress: 30%
Location: Vancouver Island
Default

I agree with many on this thread that perhaps there are people allergic to Splenda. I am allergic to some dairy and soy products, but that doesn't mean everyone else is or that they are bad for you (although soy should be investigated further to my way of thinking, as I don't think it is as healthy as everyone thinks). I use Stevia exclusively because it is the most natural of the "artificial" sweeteners and have no problems with it and it does not induce further sugar cravings.
Reply With Quote
  #9   ^
Old Wed, Jun-02-04, 19:49
tomsej's Avatar
tomsej tomsej is offline
Rikki Tikki Tavi
Posts: 906
 
Plan: Keto Clarity & Atkins
Stats: 262.5/257.6/180 Male 5'-11"
BF:
Progress: 6%
Location: Southwestern ON, Canada
Default Stevia no on list of studied high intensity sweetners?

Hi,

I wonder why stevia was left off the list. I use Splenda and also cyclamates. I don't tolerate Aspartame too well and get headaches if i consume more than 3-sodas worth of Aspartame a day.

There were references to thymus gland shrinkage. I read years ago that Stevia was indicated in thymus gland shrinkage or thyroid gland shrinkage.

Cyclamates have been linked to shrinkage of the male testes. It seems that Splenda in indicated in fertility problems as well.

All I can say is that chlorine and chloroform are INTENTIONALLY put into the Waterloo Region water supply to kill cryprospiridium and bacterias.

We bought a distiller to keep our kids from drinking this crap.

I'd say it's all in perspective. I can't even drink one cup of my raw tap water without feeling sick both from the smell and the taste.

How much did they study this before doing it? Nada. Kills the bad stuff, doesn't it; don't want people dying like in Walkerton, do we?

Lots of people are allergic to penicilin and peanuts. All NUTS are banned from our Kitchener/Waterloo schools. Yet they let the kids drink the tap water ...

All I can say is, if it makes you sick, don't eat it! I wish I could have a dime back from every horrible protein bar I've eaten. Many of the bars taste so bad that I doubt my dog would eat them.

Lets get back to reality here - they are force-feeding this stuff to rats in such quantities that THEIR THYMUS glands shrink ANYWAY due to STARVATION.

They try to mitgate the fact by showing the controls of thymus shrinkage in rats that are STARVED ONLY. I'm glad I went into Engineering and not experimental and study based science. I would not be able to live with myself.

Enough said; I'm outa here.

Tom.
Reply With Quote
  #10   ^
Old Wed, Jun-02-04, 20:32
nowonder's Avatar
nowonder nowonder is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,158
 
Plan: Atkins+coffee
Stats: 290/185/180 Male 71 inches
BF:Yes, it is.
Progress: 95%
Location: West Chester, PA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kristine
I really dislike Dr Mercola's style of taking self-diagnosis and anecdotes and trying to scare people with them. He uses the long chemical nomenclature of sucralose as a reason to fear it. A high school chemistry student would understand that that's just a scare tactic: would you panic if you found out that you ingested 2-methyl-3-hydroxy-4,5-bis(hydroxy-methyl)pyridine? Don't - because that's just vitamin B6. I find it hard to take people seriously when they write like that.



Next thing you know, he will discover the horrors of dihydrogen monoxide. Hundreds of people die from inhaling too much dihydrogen monoxide, yet people are exposing their children to it! They use this stuff in nuclear power plants!

For more info on Dihydrogen monoxide, check here
Reply With Quote
  #11   ^
Old Wed, Jun-02-04, 21:35
HoserLC's Avatar
HoserLC HoserLC is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 77
 
Plan: Atkins mostly
Stats: 250/196/170 Male 5'8"
BF:100%/50%/0%
Progress: 68%
Location: Ontario
Cool

I have used all kinds of sweeteners over the years with no reactions myself.

That being said, when I learned some time ago that splenda was sugar with some chlorine molecules substituted, it did get me thinking as to possible ways things could go wrong. Various chlorinated hydrocarbons are ultra toxic, and so what was so special about splenda that it was so safe? A priori, it is suspect. The theory is that the chlorine bonds so tightly, it would be impervious to various enzymes, and it would pass right thru your body. However, I doubt it is 100% impervious, and some must absorb or break down or react or whatever. It's a wonder they didn't fluorinate it, call it Sucraflon, and peddle it as a teflon sweetener that doesn't stick in your gut.

Anyway it stands to reason that any sweetener that is 500 times as potent at stimulating the sugar receptors in your tongue is bound to trip the light fantastic of some other allergy receptor in susceptible individuals. But for the majority of us without reactions, the possibilty of sucralose metabolizing into a nastier chlorocarbon with subtle, long-term effects is a nagging question. I thought Jercola's comment that they aren't actually starting out with sucrose was interesting. I'd say the jury was still out.
Reply With Quote
  #12   ^
Old Wed, Jun-02-04, 22:12
Nancy LC's Avatar
Nancy LC Nancy LC is offline
Experimenter
Posts: 25,934
 
Plan: DDF
Stats: 202/185.4/179 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 72%
Location: San Diego, CA
Default

I don't think splenda is particularly new, it's been through rigourous testing and was approved in Canada and I think parts of Europe for a long, long time. Then they had to jump through US hoops and prove it to be harmless to be sold in the US. All in all, I think its been out a good 10 years, maybe longer.
Reply With Quote
  #13   ^
Old Thu, Jun-03-04, 00:44
LilaCotton's Avatar
LilaCotton LilaCotton is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,472
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 229/205/170 Female 5'6"
BF:I have Body Fat!??
Progress: 41%
Location: Idaho
Default

I won't say it's harmless, but I won't say it's real harmful, either. But shoot--I've gotta have something!

I literally grew up on saccharin, then drank Diet Pepsi with saccharin from my late teens to the time NutraSweet came out, then switched to that. I spent a lot of years drinking that stuff, then a few years back switched to Diet Rite. I'm 44 years old and haven't died of AS yet--who knows, maybe next year?

I do, however, have a sister-in-law who is very sensitive to AS. NutraSweet gives her headaches and Splenda gives her tingles. She doesn't use them--and I don't blame her.

Here's one thing to think about, though. Just because the FDA approves something doesn't mean it's harmless. Look at HRT. On top of that, look at the BST they pump into milk cows to increase milk production. That stuff's just plain nasty, and it's only just now dawning on a few people that these hormones are passing onto our children, causing early development.

Still, unless something truly horrific and shocking comes out about Splenda, I'm going to use a little of it. Life's too short to be afraid of living, at least a little.
Reply With Quote
  #14   ^
Old Thu, Jun-03-04, 10:10
nowonder's Avatar
nowonder nowonder is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,158
 
Plan: Atkins+coffee
Stats: 290/185/180 Male 71 inches
BF:Yes, it is.
Progress: 95%
Location: West Chester, PA
Default

I just noticed this was published in december of 2000, I wonder if any additional reasearch has been done since then.

--nw
Reply With Quote
  #15   ^
Old Thu, Jun-03-04, 12:44
ItsTheWooo's Avatar
ItsTheWooo ItsTheWooo is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 4,815
 
Plan: My Own
Stats: 280/118/117.5 Female 5ft 5.25 in
BF:
Progress: 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kristine
I really dislike Dr Mercola's style of taking self-diagnosis and anecdotes and trying to scare people with them. He uses the long chemical nomenclature of sucralose as a reason to fear it. A high school chemistry student would understand that that's just a scare tactic: would you panic if you found out that you ingested 2-methyl-3-hydroxy-4,5-bis(hydroxy-methyl)pyridine? Don't - because that's just vitamin B6. I find it hard to take people seriously when they write like that.

Any artificial substance carries with it some risk that you might react to it unfavorably - heck, even natural products carry that risk. Most of us know someone who could die from eating peanuts. I'm no Splenda apologist, but if you were to eat Dr Mercola's way, you'd practically have to grow your own vegetables, shoot your own animals, and never eat anything else. I'll take my chances with Splenda over sugar and almost-certain diabetes.

I agree with Kristine. I too noticed the scare monger tactics - they were very obvious and raise an immediate red flag regarding this guy's credibility in my mind.

The thing about naturalist sites like mercola and westonaprice.org is they may have some valuable information, but they are *so* biased against non-"natural" things that you have to take anything they say with a grain of salt. It seems like they go out of their way to prove anything unnatural is bad using word tricks & propaganda rather than objectively reporting all the facts. Actually it is pretty clear they have an agenda: to prove that eating a non-natural diet is always unhealthy, and eating a natural diet can cure all diseases & promote 100% health. First of all I completely disagree with this assumption. Natural does NOT absolutely equal health promoting, and unnatural does not absolutely equal disease causing, this is an emotional bias with no basis in reality. Many "natural" substances are toxic or deleterious to health, and some "unnatural" synthetic substances are health promoting. Because their assumption is false in objective reality, it seems that the only way to decide whether or not something is good or bad seems to be evaluate its effects on people in varying quantities. That said, does anyone here honestly believe caloric sweeteners (westonaprice & mercola tend to recommend "natural" sugar like honey), in equal quantities to non-caloric ones, preserve health moreso than the non-caloric sweetners? Doubt it!

Sorry, but I'll keep using splenda. Getting health info from these naturalist sources is a lot like getting health info from PCRM, they are mostly interested in promoting their agenda and not with objective scientific reality. I'm not about to give up sweet taste, and I certainly am not about to go back to using sugar. When it comes down to it, splenda does not adversely affect me at all, whereas the alternatives to splenda do. Now isn't that a fine example of synthetic & man-made triumphing over natural?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
More on liquid Splenda... Atriana General Low-Carb 2 Fri, Jul-18-03 20:19
Splenda - nutritional info manucpa General Low-Carb 2 Wed, Jul-16-03 20:59
Big "OK" on artificial sweetners zima General Low-Carb 14 Fri, Jan-24-03 17:36
News on Splenda in the UK odd sock U.K. 30 Tue, Apr-16-02 06:53
Splenda increasing cravings???? melanie 27 Newbies' Questions 4 Sat, Feb-02-02 14:28


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:39.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.