Quote:
17.3 lbs. of lean mass?!?! And this is without juego, or course, right?
|
All natural baby! I'm supplement city, but it's natural. Well, depending on who's definition of natural you take, but I didn't take anything that you can't walk into a supplement or drug store and get. I will admit to taking Animal Stack, which is a pro-hormone. Fire away, I can take it. And the added mass.
I bulk-and-cut (which is a touchy subject I know ... but it works for me).
So, from last year at this time when I was 205 at ~ 10%, I then blew myself up to 238 at ~ 16%.
Then I started to clean it up, slid into the CKD, and now am resting at 220ish ~ 9% ... with 4 weeks or so to go to get that bf% down a point or two before sliding into another mass cycle.
After all that, at this point I am well ahead of the game ...
Hmmm ... now that I crunch those numbers again I must have miscalculated or rounded wrong last time.
Lowest bodyfat ever, damn the cost (Summer 2000): 190 lbs at 7% = 177 lean, 13 fat. Yes, I looked like a starvation victim, but of course no one told me that at the time. Friends are great. This was pre-Fern ... She would have set me straight.
Last year at this time (Summer 2001) : 205 lbs at 13% = 178.5 lean, 26.5 fat. that's what happens when you drop calories too low and mess up your metabolism.
Let it be a lesson to those who think going well below AMR will be good for them. Temporarily maybe, but the other shoe has to drop sometime.
After bulking (mid-January 2002) : 236 lbs. at 16% = 198 lean, 38 fat
Current/CKD (Summer 2002) : 220 lbs. at 9% = 200 lean, 20 fat
Quote:
Just do it right and then you cant complain about carbing up!!!
|
Amen.