Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Thu, Apr-10-03, 07:42
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 27,304
 
Plan: Muscle Centric
Stats: 238/152/160 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 110%
Location: UK
Default Fad dieters put unborn children at risk

I came across this little horror story earlier today:


Fad dieters put unborn children at risk

Tim Radford in Lyon
Thursday April 10, 2003
The Guardian

The combination of fad diets for young women and fatty foods for their children could condemn future generations to an increased risk of diabetes and other afflictions, according to one of Britain's leading medical scientists.

Professor David Barker, head of the medical research council's epidemiology unit at Southampton University, said yesterday that heart disease and other illnesses could begin in the earliest stages of life in the womb. The food a mother eats before and during pregnancy could protect a child against heart attack, stroke or diabetes later in life.

But a low carbohydrate diet for young mothers and soft drinks, crisps and hamburgers for their children could spell future misery.

"That combination will fuel a continuing rise in diabetes," he said. "There are now 200 million people in the world with adult onset diabetes, and the prediction is that within a few years it will be 250 million."

Prof Barker, a father of eight, including four daughters, told the Biovision 2003 conference that evidence from well-fed Europe and the undernourished developing world told the same story.

"Why are mothers staying thin?" he asked. "Is it because they want to? In the west, the answer is yes. But in China and India there is a tradition of feeding male children at the expense of females and that practice won't just go away overnight, will it?

"The amazing thing in India is that we had the green revolution 40 years ago and the average birth weight of babies has not changed. But the average size of children has."

Paradoxically, western societies have prolonged life and shortened childhood. Girls in Finland used to begin menstruation at 17, but now do so at 10, because of improved nutrition. Fertility problems, however, seem to be on the increase.

"One guide to good nourishment is growth. That's what farmers use," Prof Barker said. "We know children in the US grow phenomenally, and I am not talking about fatness.

"All we know is that it is dependent on a balanced and varied diet. Even before birth, babies are sensitive to bodyweight and fat levels of their mother. A diet high in proteins and low in carbohydrates could create problems for the embryo, or even before that, for the egg."

His new book, The Best Start in Life, published on April 24 by Century, examines past evidence and new studies in both rich and poor societies.

"There is a clear link between thin women, and the way their babies handle sugar," he said. "Enough studies have been done on people, now in adult life, whose mother's thinness was recorded at their birth, to know that levels of thinness which might be fashionable are perceived by the baby."

He added: "The baby adopts a thrifty metabolism in relation to sugar, and that stays with it for life. That's fine if the child stays thin, but if the child does not, they are at risk.

"The combination of a thin mother and an obese offspring is dangerous."

A quarter of babies in Britain are born "thin". Their bodies have not stored sugar in the muscle, but kept it in the bloodstream to nourish the developing brain.

"The trouble about the human baby is that, compared to other mammals, it has such a big brain. So if it uses its store of sugar to help the brain develop, organs like the liver suffer quite disproportionately."


http://www.guardian.co.uk/medicine/...,933359,00.html


Quote:
A diet high in proteins and low in carbohydrates could create problems for the embryo, or even before that, for the egg."

Hmmmm, so how did we manage to evolve in the first place, given that this would have been our staple diet as a Hunter Gatherer? How did theirr brains manage to survive without sugar?

and ...

Quote:
But a low carbohydrate diet for young mothers and soft drinks, crisps and hamburgers for their children could spell future misery.
yes, I can understand the misery caused by the junk food given here as an example, but NOT from a low carb diet surely?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Thu, Apr-10-03, 07:54
Paleoanth's Avatar
Paleoanth Paleoanth is offline
Slothy Superhero
Posts: 12,159
 
Plan: Vegetarian Atkins
Stats: 165/145/125 Female 60 inches
BF:29/25.2/24
Progress: 50%
Location: Tennessee/Iowa
Default Re: Fad dieters put unborn children at risk

Quote:
Originally posted by Demi
I came across this little horror story earlier today:


Fad dieters put unborn children at risk

Paradoxically, western societies have prolonged life and shortened childhood. Girls in Finland used to begin menstruation at 17, but now do so at 10, because of improved nutrition. Fertility problems, however, seem to be on the increase.



The lowerering of the age of menarche is not necessarily due to improved nutrition. It is due to getting to the required BF % earlier in life. You need 17% BF in order to start menses. This means, they are getting to that BF% at 10 years of age. This probably explains the fertility problems as well.

You can be fat and malnourished as we all know.

I am sure the soft drinks are the main cause of the problem. Excess sugar in those drinks probably sensitizes the fetus and causes the long term problems. PLUS, phosphoric acid found in dark colas leech calcium from your bones. Something neither pregnant women or fetuses really need.

http://www.bromleyhealthmanagement....rvscocacola.htm

Last edited by Paleoanth : Thu, Apr-10-03 at 07:57.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"When It's No Longer Baby Fat" gotbeer LC Research/Media 2 Thu, Apr-22-04 16:55
"Is anticipating heart disease as easy as 1, 2, 3, 4?" gotbeer LC Research/Media 5 Tue, Feb-03-04 09:00
"Truth about the cancer trap" gotbeer LC Research/Media 0 Tue, Jan-20-04 14:03
Bigger children at risk of type 1 diabetes doreen T General Health 0 Fri, Dec-01-00 13:48


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:24.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.