Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > New Members & Low-Carbers > Newbies' Questions
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Wed, Apr-15-20, 09:50
043ched 043ched is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 26
 
Plan: none
Stats: 199/201/160 Male 68
BF:
Progress: -5%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ms Arielle
IMHO, to go OMAD for me required a keto diet in the weeks before. Primes the biochemical pumps to handle mobilizing the fat stores.


I don't doubt that OMAD would work, I do doubt I could stick to it. Did OMAD result in a reduction of calories in your case, or did you maintain calories in one meal?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Wed, Apr-15-20, 18:47
Ms Arielle's Avatar
Ms Arielle Ms Arielle is online now
Senior Member
Posts: 19,928
 
Plan: atkins, carnivore 2023
Stats: 225/224/163 Female 5'8"
BF:
Progress: 2%
Location: Massachusetts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 043ched
I don't doubt that OMAD would work, I do doubt I could stick to it. Did OMAD result in a reduction of calories in your case, or did you maintain calories in one meal?

To drop weight means utilizing body fat for energy. That requires eating fewer calories. On keto Im much less hungry than eating SAD. So while Im not promoting 23/1 as better than any other IF window, my point is that intake must decrease lower than output such that the body must mobilize its fat stores to make up the difference.

For me, I cannot eat 24hrs worth of calories within one hour in other words, I will be full, but cannot eat some 2000 calories. This forces the stored fat to be used and weight will drop.

Initally calories in the form of ketones spill out thru the urine. But that is only for short period of time : as body becomes fat adapted, it uses those ketones as fuel.

Using stored fat is less efficient than just eating calories, so we get a little bumb in weight loss.

Ive heard some people dont switch back and forth easily. And sticking to very low carbs ( stay in ketosis) can be easier for most.
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Thu, Apr-16-20, 07:24
043ched 043ched is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 26
 
Plan: none
Stats: 199/201/160 Male 68
BF:
Progress: -5%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ms Arielle
TOn keto Im much less hungry than eating SAD. So while Im not promoting 23/1 as better than any other IF window, my point is that intake must decrease lower than output such that the body must mobilize its fat stores to make up the difference.


That makes a lot of sense. I don't doubt that the "casual" carb is causing me to eat more than I should.

[/QUOTE]
Ive heard some people dont switch back and forth easily. And sticking to very low carbs ( stay in ketosis) can be easier for most.[/QUOTE]

I probably one of those people that shouldn't switch back and forth. My thinking right now is opposite of Atkins, meaning rather than adding back carbs, to gradually reduce until I find the right level.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 21:18.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.