Sun, Dec-01-02, 15:07
|
Registered Member
Posts: 32
|
|
Plan: Combo Low Carb
Stats: 182/155/140
BF:Don't wanna know!
Progress: 64%
Location: South Florida
|
|
Quote:
Perhaps you're not considering the Atkins plan as a valid one to follow because of the stall?
|
Actually, I do see Atkins as very valid--it worked so well for me for those first 22#. But my 4-month stall convinced me to explore other options. Atkins himself said that if one reaches a long plateau, to go off the woe onto another controlled plan. The key is "controlled" -- not just go off the woe and eat whatever! Eventually, I may return to Atkins for maintanance, but something I was doing prevented me from further loss. I ruled out yeast, wheat allergy, dairy, & egg. I really didn't know what else to try. You're right--Atkins doesn't speak about percentages of macronutrients--that was from several other LC books. (Zone, Insulin Resistance Diet, Somersize, etc.)
Quote:
It was my understanding that carbs without fats were the biggest problem.
|
According to Protein Power , High Carbo with Low Protein causes the biggest insulin spike, and second on the list is Carbohydrate alone. Next on the list is Carbs with Fat. (p.37). I have found Protein Power to be the most informative in terms of valid scientific explanation in laymen's terms.
My original question referred to the drastic difference in philosophy/physiology between keeping the different food types together vs. separate and any explanations anyone has about either/both. Thanks for any insight!
|