Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Sun, Jan-22-06, 12:47
doreen T's Avatar
doreen T doreen T is offline
Forum Founder
Posts: 37,416
 
Plan: LC, GF
Stats: 241/190/140 Female 165 cm
BF:
Progress: 50%
Location: Eastern ON, Canada
Default FDA Considering OTC Sale of Fat Blocking Pill

FDA Considering OTC Sale of Fat Blocking Pill

By ANDREW BRIDGES, Associated Press Writer

Sun Jan 22, 6:21 AM ET

WASHINGTON -
A pharmaceutical company that seeks federal approval for over-the-counter sales of a prescription diet pill that blocks the absorption of fat faces questions on the pill's potential for creating vitamin deficiencies and encouraging abuse.

Two Food and Drug Administration advisory committees are to discuss on Monday allowing over-the-counter sales of orlistat, which GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare proposes to market as Alli (pronounced "ally"). That version would be half the dose of the prescription form of the drug, known as Xenical, which won FDA approval in 1999.

An FDA reviewer found the drug is a "safe and effective weight loss agent," but held off on recommending whether the Nonprescription Drugs and the Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs advisory committees should in turn recommend to the FDA that it approve the drug for sale without a prescription.

The drug acts by blocking the absorption of about one-quarter the fat a patient consumes. That fat is then passed out of the body in stools, which can be loose or oily as a result.

In six-month clinical trials, obese subjects who took orlistat lost on average 5.3 pounds to 6.2 pounds more than did those who were given dummy pills, according to FDA documents released Friday.

FDA reviewer Dr. Karen Feibus said the primary concern with the drug is its potential to create vitamin deficiencies, since its use also would block absorption of fat-soluble vitamins like D, E, K and beta-carotene.

The company recommends patients take multivitamins when using the drug, said Steve Burton, GlaxoSmithKline's vice president of weight control. Whether that would happen remains unclear: at least 47 percent of the people involved in trials of the drug did not take multivitamins as recommended, the FDA said.

Orlistat may also block some drugs, including cyclosporine, used to prevent rejection of kidney, liver and heart transplants. Orlistat shouldn't be taken with that drug, the FDA said.

Furthermore, just 35 percent of diabetes patients in a study correctly stated the drug was not appropriate for them to use, according to agency documents.

The regulatory agency also is concerned about increased potential for abuse or misuse of the prescription-free version of the drug, especially among bulimics or binge-eaters who could develop vitamin deficiencies due to chronic use of the drug. There are at least four published reports of women suffering from bulimia using the prescription form of the drug as a purgative. An estimated 22 million people worldwide have used the drug.

"We believe there is a very low potential for misuse and abuse. But we need to be vigilant," Burton said.

The unpleasantness of the drug's side effects, including "involuntary leakage" of undigested fat, should limit its abuse, said Dr. Howard Eisenson, director of the Duke Diet and Fitness Center in Durham, N.C.

"I think to some extent, the side effects will limit the potential for abuse, because the side effects are uncomfortable or messy," said Eisenson, adding he has no financial ties to the drug or its manufacturer.

The company plans to limit sales of the drug to adults. It expects women to make up 80 percent of the expected market for the drug, which would cost consumers an estimated $12 to $25 a week.

The company intends to package Alli as part of an overall diet and fitness program. The program would emphasis eating a lower-fat diet, to both cut calories and curtail the drug's effect on a user's stools.

United Kingdom-based GlaxoSmithKline's U.S. operations are based in Philadelphia and Research Triangle Park, N.C.

The company declined to share sales projections, but said that 130 million Americans are overweight or obese and that consumers spend $23 billion each year on weight-loss strategies.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060122...he_me/diet_pill

.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Sun, Jan-22-06, 13:00
Lisa N's Avatar
Lisa N Lisa N is offline
Posts: 12,028
 
Plan: Bernstein Diabetes Soluti
Stats: 260/-/145 Female 5' 3"
BF:
Progress: 63%
Location: Michigan
Default

Quote:
The company intends to package Alli as part of an overall diet and fitness program. The program would emphasis eating a lower-fat diet, to both cut calories and curtail the drug's effect on a user's stools.


Yup...that makes lots of sense to me. Here...take our drug that blocks fat absorption (along with a lot of fat soluble vitamins that you need to be healthy) and may give you diarrhea and oily leakage but to minimize that effect, eat a low fat diet which pretty much eliminates the need for the drug in the first place because now you don't have any fat calories to block...
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Sun, Jan-22-06, 13:04
doreen T's Avatar
doreen T doreen T is offline
Forum Founder
Posts: 37,416
 
Plan: LC, GF
Stats: 241/190/140 Female 165 cm
BF:
Progress: 50%
Location: Eastern ON, Canada
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lisa N
..... and may give you diarrhea and oily leakage .....

The package directions should also include recommended cough and sneeze blockers ....


Doreen
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Sun, Jan-22-06, 14:13
Dodger's Avatar
Dodger Dodger is offline
Posts: 8,804
 
Plan: Paleoish/Keto
Stats: 225/167/175 Male 71.5 inches
BF:18%
Progress: 116%
Location: Longmont, Colorado
Default

Can you imagine working in an office with someone who has '"involuntary leakage" of undigested fat'?
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Sun, Jan-22-06, 14:28
Zuleikaa Zuleikaa is offline
Finding the Pieces
Posts: 17,055
 
Plan: Mishmash
Stats: 365/260.0/185 Female 66
BF:
Progress: 58%
Location: Boston, MA, US
Default

Reminds me of Jeff Foxworthy's routine on drugs and their side effects!!!
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Sun, Jan-22-06, 14:40
kebaldwin kebaldwin is offline
Thank you Dr Atkins!
Posts: 4,146
 
Plan: Atkins induction
Stats: 311/250/220 Male 6 feet
BF:45%/20%/15%
Progress: 67%
Location: North Carolina
Default

Why was it only the tobacco companies got sued ???

IMHO the pharama companies have done much more damage ...
Reply With Quote
  #7   ^
Old Sun, Jan-22-06, 16:22
LilithD's Avatar
LilithD LilithD is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 602
 
Plan: paleo/atkins
Stats: 134/134/127 Female 172
BF:
Progress: 0%
Location: New Zealand
Default

"The company recommends patients take multivitamins when using the drug, said Steve Burton, GlaxoSmithKline's vice president of weight control. Whether that would happen remains unclear: at least 47 percent of the people involved in trials of the drug did not take multivitamins as recommended, the FDA said."

How does it remain 'unclear' then? Obviously about half of the users (probably more it it's just OTC) would *not* take the supplements.
Reply With Quote
  #8   ^
Old Sun, Jan-22-06, 23:15
betnich betnich is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 99
 
Plan: own
Stats: -/-/- Female 65
BF:
Progress:
Default

The potential for abuse of an OTC version of Xenical is just too great, IMO. This problematic drug should remain a controlled substance...

:-(
Reply With Quote
  #9   ^
Old Sun, Jan-22-06, 23:33
LC_Dave LC_Dave is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 959
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 473/332/190 Male 75.6
BF:
Progress: 50%
Location: Melbourne Australia
Default

Is there long term studies that this actually assists in weight lose and helps you maintain your weight ?

Someone is making a buck out of human misery!
Reply With Quote
  #10   ^
Old Mon, Jan-23-06, 07:16
kyrasdad's Avatar
kyrasdad kyrasdad is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 3,060
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 338/253/210 Male 5'11"
BF:
Progress: 66%
Location: Broken Arrow, Oklahoma
Default

If you're walking around with "oily leakage" of undigested fat and diarrhea all the time, you'd think that at least you'd not have to eat a punishing low-fat diet to lose a little weight.
Reply With Quote
  #11   ^
Old Mon, Jan-23-06, 08:09
bkloots's Avatar
bkloots bkloots is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 10,154
 
Plan: LC--Atkins
Stats: 195/158/150 Female 62in
BF:
Progress: 82%
Location: Kansas City, MO
Default

Quote:
faces questions on the pill's potential for creating vitamin deficiencies and encouraging abuse


Isn't abuse of OTC pills like this practically a given??

If you take a starch blocker AND a fat blocker, can you eat everything in sight and still starve to death? How about adding a "metabolism booster" so you can starve to death even faster? OR if you've had your stomach stapled, you can live on very small quantities of tostitos, ice cream, and M&Ms consumed throughout the day.

I feel sick.
Reply With Quote
  #12   ^
Old Mon, Jan-23-06, 13:55
LilithD's Avatar
LilithD LilithD is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 602
 
Plan: paleo/atkins
Stats: 134/134/127 Female 172
BF:
Progress: 0%
Location: New Zealand
Default

Reminds me of that drug alcoholic people can take that makes alcohol consumption a horrible experience and supposedly puts them off it.
Reply With Quote
  #13   ^
Old Mon, Jan-23-06, 14:57
ceberezin ceberezin is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 619
 
Plan: Protein Power
Stats: 155/140/140 Male 68
BF:18%
Progress:
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Default

This drug is less than useless. If it blocks only dietary fat, it doesn't do a damn thing about fat from de novo lipogenesis, so while your anus is leaking, you still have high triglycerides and lots of adipose tissue.

Dietary fat is the primary source of beneficial and essential fatty acids, while fat from de novo lipogenesis is primarily palmitate. So this drug would increase the proportion of palmitate in our bodies and suppress beneficial and essential fatty acids.
Reply With Quote
  #14   ^
Old Mon, Jan-23-06, 15:22
Dodger's Avatar
Dodger Dodger is offline
Posts: 8,804
 
Plan: Paleoish/Keto
Stats: 225/167/175 Male 71.5 inches
BF:18%
Progress: 116%
Location: Longmont, Colorado
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ceberezin
This drug is less than useless. If it blocks only dietary fat, it doesn't do a damn thing about fat from de novo lipogenesis, so while your anus is leaking, you still have high triglycerides and lots of adipose tissue.

Dietary fat is the primary source of beneficial and essential fatty acids, while fat from de novo lipogenesis is primarily palmitate. So this drug would increase the proportion of palmitate in our bodies and suppress beneficial and essential fatty acids.
But is would make money for GlaxoSmithKline.
Reply With Quote
  #15   ^
Old Tue, Jan-24-06, 05:44
doreen T's Avatar
doreen T doreen T is offline
Forum Founder
Posts: 37,416
 
Plan: LC, GF
Stats: 241/190/140 Female 165 cm
BF:
Progress: 50%
Location: Eastern ON, Canada
Default

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 17:19.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.