Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Local Low-Carbers & Support Groups > U.K.
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   ^
Old Sun, Jan-30-05, 07:08
SucraPhobe's Avatar
SucraPhobe SucraPhobe is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 98
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 215/168/160 Male 69in
BF:
Progress: 85%
Location: Near London by way of NYC
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by doreen T
In the USA, manufacturers are permitted to pre-subtract fiber before calculating the caloric energy value of the food; this is often (but not always) done with high fiber foods.

From the USDA nutrient database FAQ's:
In the case of the Nalley Chili w. beans, the fiber content is very high so it has been pre-subtracted. If the fiber grams were not subtracted, the total carbs would show 41g.


I understand the text, and agree that IN CALCULATING CALORIES fiber should be subtracted (always or at least for high-fiber food).

But whether fiber is subtracted or not in CALORIE CALCULATION, and how it is listed in the table are independent things.

It seems that their general policy is to include fiber in the CH total. It is perfectly possible for them to subtract the fiber in calculating calories, and still list the fiber as part of the CH content, for the sake of consistency and preventing confusion.

They should be CONSISTENT in the way they LIST the fiber (either always include it in the CH total or never include it).

In other words, they simply have a bug in their database.

I'd bet if someone emailed them, they'd fix it. (Not the calorie count, which is fine, but the way they list the fiber).
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 22:18.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.