Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Thu, May-29-03, 17:20
gotbeer's Avatar
gotbeer gotbeer is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 2,889
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 280/203/200 Male 69 inches
BF:
Progress: 96%
Location: Dallas, TX, USA
Default "Detractors are being forced to eat their scathing words; Praise the Lard"

Praise the Lard

(Filed: 25/05/2003)


link to article

Detractors are being forced to eat their scathing words after two studies last week found that the Atkins diet works - and it's good for you, report Olga Craig and Robert Matthews

It made him a multi-millionaire, won him the gushing gratitude of a host of now svelte Hollywood stars and made his name synonymous with weight loss. Dr Atkins' Diet Revolution and Dr Atkins' New Diet Revolution, the tomes that have been tucked into the bookshelves of thousands of slimmers throughout the past 30 years, transformed the career of Dr Robert Atkins from that of humble cardiologist to diet guru.

The updated version has topped the best-sellers list for five years, sold 25 million copies, been read by 50 million people and includes Catherine Zeta Jones, Renee Zellweger, Geri Halliwell, Jennifer Aniston and Minnie Driver among its devotees. The F Plan, the Scarsdale and the Cabbage Soup Diet have come and gone, but not the Atkins diet. While its popularity may have waned in the 1980s, its endorsement by A-list celebrities sent it soaring again in the 1990s with the publication of Dr Atkins' New Diet Cookbook.

Yet credibility and scientific recognition, the twin accolades that Dr Atkins fought harder for than fame or fortune - he amassed $100 million - eluded him in his lifetime. His controversial diet, based on the philosophy that feasting on fats and high-protein foods while shunning carbohydrates is the best way to achieve lasting weight loss, may have won millions of converts but time and time again it was rubbished in the worlds of science and medicine.

Doctors and dieticians dubbed it dangerous, claiming that it could lead to cancer, heart disease and diabetes. Some even urged slimmers to sue Dr Atkins on the grounds that what he preached was "nutritional heresy". In America, Neal Barnard, the president of the Physicians' Committee for Responsible Medicine, told Dr Atkins: "This is exactly the sort of diet you would put someone on if you wanted to give them colon cancer, kidney disease, heart disease or osteoporosis." And in Britain his words were echoed by Dr Wendy Doyle of the British Dietic Association who said: "There is evidence to prove this diet is dangerous."

Dr Atkins was even forced to defend his controversial diet before the US Congress.

How untimely then, that he has achieved so soon after death the vindication he so desperately sought in life. When, a month ago, he slipped on an icy pavement outside his New York office, suffering a fatal brain haemorrhage, he was oblivious to the fact that two leading US universities were on the verge of publishing studies in The New England Journal of Medicine affirming his life's work.

Not only does the Atkins diet work, they concluded, but in reducing the chances of stroke and heart disease it is one of the most healthy food regimes one can adopt. Their publications came a month too late for Dr Atkins to relish the science world being forced to eat its scathing words of criticism. Veronica, his widow, said yesterday: "My belief in my husband never wavered. I always knew he would be proved right. I am only sorry he had to wait so long and is not here to himself savour the moment."

Only a year ago, when he suffered a heart attack, the medical world gloated as he lay in intensive care, despite his insistence that his cardiac arrest was brought on by an infection.

Among Dr Atkins's devotees, the news this week that his diet is not just safe but extremely healthy has been welcomed with delight. This morning Ben Anderson, 37, will don his running shoes as he does every Sunday and jog around Hyde Park. At six feet tall, he weighs 12 stone - 18 months ago he was 18 stone. "After my run I will have breakfast at my favourite greasy spoon, the full works," Ben says. "Sausages, bacon and a couple of fried eggs. Atkins worked for me. It was the first diet that didn't leave me feeling hungry. Eat fat, grow thin, I say."

His words go some way to explaining the diet's appeal, especially to men. "At heart, men are greedy," says one afficionado. "We don't like to be told to eat small portions. But this diet allows real man food. And it doesn't ban alcohol."

Put simply, the Atkins diet works thus. If you eat lots of protein and cut out carbohydrates your body will stop releasing floods of insulin - the hormone Dr Atkins called the "fattening hormone". As a result, less fat will be stored in the body. When the body is loaded with protein the kidneys are forced to work overtime to get rid of it. It takes energy to do this and, without carbohydrate, the body starts breaking down fat to make fuel.

While the philosophy sounds simple, sticking to the diet is more difficult. Feasting on mounds of meat and cheese sounds like a reasonable trade-off for being denied bread and pasta (even fruit) but in reality it becomes mind-numbingly monotonous. As Toni Steer from the Medical Research Council's Human Nutrition Research Unit in Cambridge says: "If you sit down and try to eat just a plate of meat, it is very difficult to do so in any quantity. It is all too boring. I think the Atkins diet works simply because you are not eating as many calories."

Yet while some are still sceptical, the studies published last week show that the experts who jeered at Atkins have been wrong. When the university of Pennsylvania and the university of Philadelphia tested the Atkins diet against a conventional low-fat diet on obese men and women the slimmers consistently lost more weight on Atkins, and had much less trouble maintaining their goal.

With studies of low-carb diets still in their infancy, the results have been greeted with understandable caution. Yet there is no doubt that among many scientists there is palpable irritation that Dr Atkins may have spotted something the brilliant minds of academia missed.

The current fuss over low-carb diets has come at an awkward time for nutritional research. As The Telegraph first highlighted more than a year ago the mantra of "fat is bad, carb is good" that we have been fed for years is not merely wrong, but potentially dangerous. Despite years of finger-wagging propaganda, nutritionists now admit that not a single study has confirmed that a low-fat diet produces clear long-term health benefits.

What has emerged, however, is increasing evidence of the dangers of a diet high in refined carbohydrates such as potatoes, white bread and cereals such as cornflakes. Rapidly broken down into glucose, these high "glycaemic index" (GI) foods trigger a surge in insulin levels, causing blood sugar levels to plummet. The long-term effects are believed to be increased risk of cardiovascular disease.

Amazingly, these are precisely the foods that get star billing in official recommendations of the relative amounts of food needed for healthy living. The British Nutrition Foundation goes so far as to recommend that we should eat even more bread, potatoes, rice and pasta for a balanced diet.

How did nutritionists come to be so dangerously wide of the mark? Earlier this year, Professors Walter Willett and Meir Stampfer at the Harvard School of Public Health published a review of the debacle in Scientific American. One key factor, they argue, was an attempt by nutritionists to keep their message simple. By blithely insisting that all fat is bad, officials rode roughshod over the fact that only saturated fat has been linked with heart disease. Studies have shown that other forms of fat, from olives and fish, for example, are beneficial.

The oversimplification created another problem. By ruling out all fat, nutritionists were forced to find the calories needed for life from somewhere else. Protein sources - favoured by Dr Atkins - were ruled out because they often come with high amounts of saturated fat. That left carbohydrates.

Until recently, no one thought to check such advice. Now it is clear that the simple "Fat is bad, carb is good" message has been a public health blunder. Nevertheless, the BNF has no plans to change its guidelines about the level of carbohydrate intake. - though it does recommend using wholegrain, unprocessed varieties whenever possible. The growing evidence that "Fat is sometimes good, carbs often bad, especially if heavily processed", may not make such a snappy mantra, but seems to have the virtue of being right.

Doubtless the medical wrangles over whether the Atkins diet truly works will continue. This summer the late doctor's final tome will be published. Its title is Atkins For Life - a rather unfortunate title for a posthumous publication.

Last edited by gotbeer : Thu, May-29-03 at 17:24.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Thu, May-29-03, 23:30
GaryW GaryW is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 85
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 277/223/180 Male 71
BF:
Progress: 56%
Location: California, USA
Default Author must've been asleep that past 6 months

It's too bad the author didn't do their homework a bit more thoroughly to realize that there were several studies the past 12 months Atkins was able to enjoy which demonstrated his diet is healthier (those of you keeping of things know of the several 6-month studies that were made and publicized last year, in fact, on his last Larry King TV show half a year ago, King asked him how it felt to be vindicated, and Atkins responded positively.)
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Fri, May-30-03, 00:05
GaryW GaryW is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 85
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 277/223/180 Male 71
BF:
Progress: 56%
Location: California, USA
Default I called them on the carpet

There's too much positive evidence and easily available facts about this way of life to allow flaming ignorant reporters to do their job so incompetently without being put on notice. We have to look past just the positive points this article makes to realize it's not truly a completely positive article. It needlessly bad-mouths the diet (in what it wrongly claims it involves) which could turn some newbies off. We need them once and for all to GET THE STORY RIGHT about what the Atkins Diet is, rather than grab onto some of the very latest studies, and still use the old incorrect "templates" in even (mis)reporting them.

Accordingly, I emailed their senior editor (thanks for the first post in this thread providing a link to the article source and feedback links to the telegraph.co.uk it originated from).

Here's what I emailed... I had a better version, but it disappeared in their flakey online form - careful to save a copy before hitting submit.

re: recent article Pass the Lard.

It's too bad the two authors Olga Craig and Robert Matthews didn't do their homework more thoroughly to realize that there were several crucially important 6-month medical studies published in 2002 that Atkins was able to enjoy which demonstrated his diet is healthier. In fact, on his last Larry King TV show half a year ago, King asked Atkins how it felt to be vindicated, and Atkins responded positively.)
How your reporters missed those widely publicized studies is a mystery, but the fact that they also misreported this diet from incorrect sources as being only meat and cheese, without veggies / fruits further suggests neither of your reporters bothered to even skim the first chapter of his book. Vegetables are not only allowed, but in fact an enjoyable essential part of his diet. Fruit is allowed in numerous examples as well. That's pretty lame journalism in not even accurately describing what the diet involves. Let's hope they are more careful next time they report on a diet, by getting more than just half the story right and having to eat low-carb crow. Details matter, especially when they're so easy to verify as in this case.

Last edited by GaryW : Fri, May-30-03 at 00:08.
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Fri, May-30-03, 00:15
GaryW GaryW is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 85
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 277/223/180 Male 71
BF:
Progress: 56%
Location: California, USA
Default Delayed publication in the UK?

Interesting to note their claim Atkins for Life won't be published till this Summer. Maybe their myopia infers some sort of half-year delayed publication in the UK, though I doubt it, and furthermore, we know it was published here earlier this year, thus it's not a "posthumous" publication in terms of the world at large.

These two reporters really are some odd birds! It's as though they were in hibernation all of last year and the first half of this, oblivious to numerous events. A "let's do the timewarp" is definitely not advised in the journalism community.

If I wrote my computer programs as sloppy as these two reporters do their job, I'd soon see my entire disk drive wiped out from a catastophic program error.
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Fri, May-30-03, 08:44
DebPenny's Avatar
DebPenny DebPenny is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,514
 
Plan: TSP/PPLP/low-cal/My own
Stats: 250/209/150 Female 63.5 inches
BF:
Progress: 41%
Location: Sacramento, CA
Default

Quote:
... but in reality it becomes mind-numbingly monotonous.
This is a common thread through many of the reports on Atkins and low-carbing. I don't get it. I've been low-carbing for 16 months now and I'm not, nor have I ever been, bored with the food. There is so much rich variety with meat and vegetables, it's impossible to be bored.

;-Deb
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Fri, May-30-03, 11:27
gotbeer's Avatar
gotbeer gotbeer is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 2,889
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 280/203/200 Male 69 inches
BF:
Progress: 96%
Location: Dallas, TX, USA
Default

There is an art and an expense to the preparation of meat. If you are an underpaid newspaper reporter and "Meat" means boiled hot dogs for every meal, then mind-numbing monotony sounds about right.

One cooks steak differently from pork tenderloin, and chicken differently from both - etc., etc - a skill that takes some effort to learn, and some just don't care to make the effort.

A healthy diet includes a variety of foods regardless of whether one is eating low carb, low fat, or low protein.
Reply With Quote
  #7   ^
Old Fri, May-30-03, 12:49
GrlyGrl's Avatar
GrlyGrl GrlyGrl is offline
SanePsychoSuprGodess
Posts: 496
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 205/191/115 Female 5' 1"
BF:46%/41%/20%
Progress: 16%
Location: Chicago suburbs, IL
Default

Yes - DebPenny you are right on! I have a MUCH more varied diet now than ever before. I know I get a much bigger variety of vegetables. Fats and cheeses allow me to add rich flavors to everything I eat. Since I am not trying to avoid fat, I have expanded the variety of meats that I eat, also. I have some lamb chops, shrimp, pork chops, "fresh" fish, cornish game hen, chicken, beef, etc. in my fridge. There is a lot more variety on a low-carb WOE than on low-fat diet -- tuna without mayo on celery sticks gets pretty boring!

P.S. To save money, I shop around: I find a lot of good meat and nut/seed bargains at Trader Joe's. I also freeze a lot when I cook so I waste less food.

Last edited by GrlyGrl : Fri, May-30-03 at 12:54.
Reply With Quote
  #8   ^
Old Sun, Jun-01-03, 00:28
Natkins's Avatar
Natkins Natkins is offline
Hello
Posts: 4,836
 
Plan: Modified Ketogenic
Stats: 182/180/145 Female 5 feet 6 inches
BF:
Progress: 5%
Location: Texas
Default

What I can't believe is this quote:

As Toni Steer from the Medical Research Council's Human Nutrition Research Unit in Cambridge says: "If you sit down and try to eat just a plate of meat, it is very difficult to do so in any quantity. It is all too boring. I think the Atkins diet works simply because you are not eating as many calories."

Now I don't know about you, but I can quite happily eat a 16 oz. prime rib, cooked medium rare. I see absolutely nothing "difficult" about that!! And even if I did, there are (as has been pointed out) SO many more options to put on that plate!!

Anyway, it's Atkins for Life for me!!!
Reply With Quote
  #9   ^
Old Sun, Jun-01-03, 08:50
finnz finnz is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 51
 
Plan: atkins
Stats: 187/166.5/160 Male 69 in
BF:
Progress: 76%
Location: Ireland
Default

If that Tony Steer works for the Medical Research Council's Human Nutrition Research Unit, then I'm a banana!!. What he should do is 'Research'. That usually means reading DANDR and other sources of information. Perhaps if he even looked up 'Atkins' in Yahoo, he would find this site. Perhaps then, he would pen his ramblings with a little more knowledge of the subject.
Reply With Quote
  #10   ^
Old Sat, Jun-28-03, 13:22
rlwalker rlwalker is offline
New Member
Posts: 2
 
Plan: greatly reduced carbs
Stats: 273/245/180
BF:
Progress: 30%
Location: Pensacola FL
Default Detractors are being forced to eat their scathing words ...

I don't know about anyone else, but I'm waiting (not holding my breath) for the geniuses at Harvard Medical School, who have consistently condemned the low carbohydrate diet, called it dangerous and those who promoted it quacks, to finally respond favorably. The first hedge was "Ok, you can lose weight, but the long term effects can be dangerous to the kidneys, etc." The only question is, will they admit they were wrong? ... or will the simply drop the matter and hope it disappears? Either will be very revealing.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:08.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.