Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1   ^
Old Wed, Jul-10-02, 19:29
tamarian's Avatar
tamarian tamarian is offline
Forum Founder
Posts: 19,572
 
Plan: Atkins/PP/BFL
Stats: 400/223/200 Male 5 ft 11
BF:37%/17%/12%
Progress: 89%
Location: Ottawa, ON
Default First law suit, for siting the Swedish Study

Organic Bread Targeted to Show Absurd Health Scares
Wed Jul 10, 4:56 PM ET

By Jill Serjeant

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - A U.S. health education group on Wednesday took legal action against the world's largest retailer of natural and organic foods in a bid to highlight what it called absurd food health scares.

A legal notice targeting whole-wheat and organic bread sold by the U.S. chain Whole Foods Market was filed by the American Council on Science and Health (ACSH) after a worldwide scare over acrylamide, which can cause cancer in animals.

Preliminary scientific studies have found that acrylamide -- a substance found in fries, potato chips, water, coffee and carbohydrate rich foods such as bread that are fried or baked -- can cause cancer in animals. The World Health Organization ( news - web sites) last month said acrylamide was a cause of concern but more research was needed about the possible effect on humans.

"We are not suggesting that their whole-wheat organic bread is dangerous. We are not seriously suggesting this bread can make you sick. Clearly people are not at risk," said Jeff Stier, associate director of the ACSH.

"We want the American public to focus on the real health risks, such as cigarette smoking and wearing bicycle helmets and eating a diet rich in fruit and vegetables, rather than focusing on food scares," Stier told Reuters.

The legal notice of intent to sue Whole Food Market, which has 133 stores across the United States, was filed under California's Proposition 65 law, which requires manufacturers to withdraw or label foods and other products containing potentially toxic chemicals.

PROPOSITION 65 'ABSURD' AND 'FLAWED'

Proposition 65, passed by voters in 1986, has been used against makers of products ranging from crayons to dental braces, and California buildings ranging from dry cleaning stores to gas stations are plastered with consumer warnings.

"We are doing this to illustrate the absurdity of Proposition 65. The whole law is flawed. It is ill-advised," Stier said.

The letter sent by the ACSH to the Austin, Texas headquarters of Whole Foods Market, alleges that "All people are exposed when they ingest and eat your products" citing whole wheat bread and organic bread.

Whole Foods Market and the California attorney general have 60 days to reply to the letter, which constitutes a legal notice of intent to sue under the terms of Proposition 65. Whole Foods Market has yet to receive a copy of the notice.

The nation's top French fry sellers, McDonald's and Burger King have already been targeted in the acrylamide scare by a small California environmental group which has been accused in the past of "bounty hunting" for flooding California authorities with Proposition 65 notices.

Burger King said last week the legal action was "frivolous and totally ludicrous."

The New York based ACSH, a nonprofit consumer education consortium, was founded in 1978 by scientists with a mission to help Americans distinguish between real and hypothetical health risks. It receives some funds from food and chemical industries under a "no strings attached" policy.

Stier said Proposition 65 laws were at fault for failing to distinguish between the effect of toxins and carcinogens on animals and on humans, and the failure to state how big a dose of toxins in food or the environment was needed to pose a real threat to human health.


http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tm...alth_bread_dc_1
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Full text: A Randomized Trial Comparing a Very Low tamarian LC Research/Media 0 Thu, Jul-10-03 17:21
Slam dunk, over 100 stories today in the media, re AHA research validating Atkins an tamarian LC Research/Media 10 Tue, Jun-17-03 07:27
Atkins Research Update tamarian LC Research/Media 0 Fri, Nov-08-02 18:30
Current and Potential Drugs for Treatment of Obesity-Endocrine Reviews Voyajer LC Research/Media 0 Mon, Jul-15-02 18:57
Study finds likely carcinogen in many starchy foods ... British confirm Swedish study doreen T LC Research/Media 3 Sat, May-18-02 15:47


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 13:33.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.