Fri, Mar-12-04, 14:38
|
 |
Experimenter
Posts: 25,934
|
|
Plan: DDF
Stats: 202/185.4/179
BF:
Progress: 72%
Location: San Diego, CA
|
|
The PCRM Physicians and Dr. Atkins
There's a lengthy article at http://www.newyorkmetro.com/nymetro...035//index.html that you should read. It talks about McDougall, Barnard, PCRM, Ornish and Pritikin, plus Dr. Atkins and why he is so controversial. Some GREAT insights into PCRM's bitterness including:
Quote:
For vegetarians, Atkins’s triumph had created a special suffering. “It’s insane,” says John McDougall, 56, after returning from windsurfing one afternoon. “I consider this terribly wrong.” Not only does it seem bad nutrition to him—“It will rot your arteries,” he says—it seems bad values, not to mention bad business. McDougall, author of the once best-selling The McDougall Program, was told by his publisher to do Atkins-like high-protein diet books. “You’re of the eighties,” they told him.
|
And then...
Quote:
Twenty years ago, as a resident at St. Vincent’s, Neal Barnard founded Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, which grew to include 5,000 vegetarian-minded docs. Barnard, who grew up in a cattle-ranching family, had his vegetarian epiphany after assisting at an autopsy. (Later that day, ribs were the special in the cafeteria.) Barnard soon became convinced that meat was not only unappetizing, it was a danger. “Meat consumption is just as dangerous to public health as tobacco use,” he said, completing the familial heresy. Plus, of course, meat wasn’t nice. The Physicians Committee didn’t particularly like lab experiments on animals, a stand it shared with the militant peta, for which Barnard was a medical adviser.
|
|
Threaded Mode