Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Daily Low-Carb Support > General Low-Carb
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Mon, Feb-04-02, 06:05
KarenB's Avatar
KarenB KarenB is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 922
 
Plan: Trim-Wise: LifeForce International
Stats: 213/209/150
BF:32%/??/ 21%
Progress: 6%
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Question Which Math Formula?

It occurs to me that I have now seen *two* formulae for calculating how many calories one should be ingesting while following this WOL.

One is "ten times your weight, plus 10-12 percent."

The other is "ten to twelve calories per pound of current weight."

These don't give the same results. With the first one (which I've been trying to follow, and done pretty well with), my upper limit as of now is 1971 calories. With the second, it would be 2112.

Can anyone straighten out my confusion? If I *should* be eating more, I'd like to know.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Mon, Feb-04-02, 07:50
Natrushka Natrushka is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 11,512
 
Plan: IF +LC
Stats: 287/165/165 Female 66"
BF:
Progress: 100%
Default

Karen, I've yet to see the "ten times your weight, plus 10-12 percent" one. However the 10 - 12 times your weight is the guideline for satisfying your Basal Metabolic Rate - this amount will ensure that your body doesnt think it's starving. BMR accounts for 60-70% of your daily caloric need - meaning that 10 - 12 times isnt the upper limit, but rather the bare minimum. Assuming this, the two totals from the different forumlas would be closer than first thought.

Nat
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Mon, Feb-04-02, 11:37
Lessara's Avatar
Lessara Lessara is offline
Everyday Sane Psycho
Posts: 7,075
 
Plan: Bernstein, Keto IFast
Stats: 385/253/160 Female 67.5
BF:14d bsl 400/122/83
Progress: 59%
Location: Durham, NH
Smile Nat

Do you use your lean body weight or your actual?
I weight 284 and my lean body weight is 168.
Also does how overweight you are determine if you use 10%, 11% or 12%? Thanks...
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Mon, Feb-04-02, 12:16
Natrushka Natrushka is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 11,512
 
Plan: IF +LC
Stats: 287/165/165 Female 66"
BF:
Progress: 100%
Default

Lessara, you should use your actual weight. Carrying around the extra fat does take energy and resources. And no, I think the 10 - 12 number takes into account that everyone is different and BMR is 60-70% of caloric intake (and not say, a 75% constant); it's not like "You're 10% overweight, so multiply by 10" etc.

It is all approximation, of course. Unless you go in and have some serious testing done

Nat
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Mon, Feb-04-02, 20:57
KarenB's Avatar
KarenB KarenB is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 922
 
Plan: Trim-Wise: LifeForce International
Stats: 213/209/150
BF:32%/??/ 21%
Progress: 6%
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Default You mean...



I have to eat MORE?????

ROFL!!!

All righty then, back to the FitDay drawing board with a NEW target in mind...


And people wonder why I *love* this WOL!!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Formula 1 Challenge!!! nitwit Countdowns, Buddies & Challenges 20 Sun, May-30-04 16:03
Can anyone deny this is a calorie reduction diet? fodus8 Low-Carb War Zone 56 Tue, Apr-13-04 12:18
Baby Needs LC Formula to Survive!! Jeanne Sch General Low-Carb 3 Fri, Aug-08-03 16:09
Milk-Based Baby Formula Linked to Blood Pressure tamarian LC Research/Media 1 Mon, May-26-03 08:31
[Montignac] Figuring High/Low Glycemic Formula KoKo Food Combining 3 Sat, Mar-01-03 04:35


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 23:40.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.