cardio or weights? : Beginner/Low Intensity Forum : Active Low-Carber Forums

#1 ^

Tue, Jan-11-05, 14:34

LCRobbie

Senior Member

Posts: 298

Plan: Atkins
Stats: 389/312/250 Male 6'3"

BF:guess
Progress: 55%

Location: Pittsburgh, PA

cardio or weights?

I have been working out for quite a while now. I know weights before cardio.

My question is if you are in a jam and only have 30-40 minutes, which should you do, cardio or weights?

Sponsored Links

#2 ^

Tue, Jan-11-05, 16:38

bajangrl32 bajangrl32 is offline

Senior Member

Posts: 643

Plan: Carb Cycling
Stats: 208/165/145 Female 65

BF:
Progress: 68%

Location: Texas

I would go with 30 mins of weights and a 10 min HIIT on the bike or treadmill. Weights are the better choice.

Michelle

#3 ^

Tue, Jan-11-05, 16:53

Dodger Dodger is offline

Long-term low-carber

Posts: 8,803

Plan: Paleoish/Keto
Stats: 225/167/175 Male 71.5 inches

BF:18%
Progress: 116%

Location: Longmont, Colorado

It depends upon your objectives. Weights are to build muscle while cardio enhances the cardiovascular system and increases endurance.

#4 ^

Wed, Jan-12-05, 08:08

LCRobbie

Senior Member

Posts: 298

Plan: Atkins
Stats: 389/312/250 Male 6'3"

BF:guess
Progress: 55%

Location: Pittsburgh, PA

weight loss

Weight loss is the goal. I guess the same would hold true for 30 minutes. Do some weight training for the arms and legs for 15-20 minutes then the elyptical for 10-15 minutes.

Thanks

#5 ^

Wed, Jan-12-05, 14:29

lilli

Senior Member

Posts: 1,079

Plan: My own, post Atkins
Stats: 180/131/140 Female 5'5

BF:
Progress: 123%

Location: los angeles

A great way to build muscle and do cardio at the same time is by using kettlebells. Swings, in particular. I don't know if many gyms have them, though. They are great if you want a workout that's intense that won't take forever.
They are a great addition to any home gym, and possibly the single most useful type of free weight.
Info here: www.dragondoor.com