Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Mon, Sep-30-02, 20:50
doreen T's Avatar
doreen T doreen T is offline
Forum Founder
Posts: 37,417
 
Plan: LC, GF
Stats: 241/190/140 Female 165 cm
BF:
Progress: 50%
Location: Eastern ON, Canada
Default Blood sugar/ insulin control may be linked to birth weight

Last Updated: 2002-09-30 12:03:29 -0400 (Reuters Health)

By Suzanne Rostler

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Babies born weighing less than 5.5 pounds (2.5 kilograms) have a more difficult time processing glucose in their bodies than infants born at normal weight, a new study has found. This could put them at risk for a host of chronic disorders in adulthood.

Birth weight, which is influenced by the gestational age, is thought to reflect how well the baby was nourished in the womb. Low birth weight may be a risk factor for obesity, high blood pressure, diabetes and high cholesterol, among other conditions.

Glucose tolerance refers to how well the body is able to use sugar from food as energy. To investigate whether birth weight and gestational age might have an effect on glucose tolerance, the researchers studied 100 newborns weighing less than 5.5 pounds or born premature (before 38 weeks gestation). Blood sugar and insulin levels were measured before and after the babies were fed milk.

The study, published in the September issue of The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, shows that higher birth weight correlated with better glucose tolerance regardless of gestational age.

Smaller infants and those who were the most sensitive to insulin, the key blood-sugar regulating hormone, also grew the fastest in the first days of life, a phenomenon known as "catch-up growth." The researchers cite at least one study showing that catch-up growth was associated with higher body mass index (BMI) in 5-year-olds and suggest that the phenomenon may be one mechanism by which low birth weight increases the risk of obesity and the chronic disorders associated with obesity.

The findings, the authors conclude, support the idea that the environment of the womb has a strong influence on a newborn's metabolism, an influence that could extend into childhood and even adulthood.

In an interview with Reuters Health, Dr. Nigel J. Crowther, the study's lead author, explained that low birth weight babies who become obese adults have one of the highest risks of developing type 2 diabetes and heart disease.

"Dietary intake for low birth weight children should not be in a form that leads to excessive weight gain in the form of fat. In other words, do not feed your children McDonald's and Coke because you think they are too thin," said Crowther, from the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa. "Follow a healthy diet that does not contain lots of fat and refined carbohydrate."

In other findings, babies born to mothers taking medication to control their blood pressure during pregnancy were also smaller and tended to secrete more insulin after eating, compared with their peers born to mothers who were not taking medication. Overall, 50% of the infants in the study were born to mothers taking blood pressure medication.

SOURCE: The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 2002;87:4252-4256.

http://www.reutershealth.com/archiv...930elin006.html
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Wed, Oct-02-02, 08:01
plum's Avatar
plum plum is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 4,809
 
Plan: Primal Blueprint
Stats: 230/136/136 Female 5'5"
BF:
Progress: 100%
Default

thanks for posting that, Doreen. For a long time Ive thought that may be part of my problem I was 2 lb 2 oz, in 1958.....tube fed full strength Carnation milk for 2 months to give fast as possible weight gain.
In my adult life I have met several middle aged 'prem' babies struggling with weight issues.
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Thu, Oct-03-02, 11:23
Deb's Avatar
Deb Deb is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 143
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 226/198/140
BF:
Progress: 33%
Location: Toronto
Default

i was 2 months preemie and 3lbs 10 oz at birth 1969. This could explain a lot.


Deb
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Thu, Oct-03-02, 16:46
DebPenny's Avatar
DebPenny DebPenny is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,514
 
Plan: TSP/PPLP/low-cal/My own
Stats: 250/209/150 Female 63.5 inches
BF:
Progress: 41%
Location: Sacramento, CA
Default

Thanks, Doreen. I wish that explained it for me. But I was 7.5 pounds and born at 8 months. A little early, but not small by any of the standards of the day (1957).

Oh, well......

;-Deb
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Thu, Oct-03-02, 16:58
Kristine's Avatar
Kristine Kristine is offline
Forum Moderator
Posts: 26,187
 
Plan: Primal/P:E
Stats: 171/145/145 Female 5'7"
BF:
Progress: 100%
Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
Default

Very interesting. When I read the subject of this thread, I thought the concept was going to be that *heavier* babies had a higher risk of diabetes/heart disease/obesity. Having a baby over nine pounds is a diabetes risk factor for the mother, and if mom is susceptible, baby inherits many of those genes. Perhaps it's both ends of the spectrum.
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Thu, Oct-24-02, 21:23
fridayeyes's Avatar
fridayeyes fridayeyes is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,044
 
Plan: low glycemic
Stats: // Female jkl
BF:
Progress: 69%
Default

Oh, great....

I was a 2nd trimester baby and weighed 3 lbs 2 oz. They told my mother that if I had been male and/or she hadn't had a family history of diabetes that I wouldn't have lived. My sister, her second child, was six weeks premie and my bro was induced two weeks early because he was over 9 lbs.

Cheers,

Friday
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
petite ladies Dinky Countdowns, Buddies & Challenges 1830 Sat, Mar-05-05 07:31
Time Cover: "Why So Many Of Us Are Getting Diabetes" gotbeer LC Research/Media 14 Mon, Dec-08-03 19:47
Here is an article bashing 'big fat lie': fairchild LC Research/Media 18 Mon, Sep-08-03 16:37
Dairy vs Stalls .... Princesspp Tips and Stalls 10 Sat, Jul-13-02 08:07
New York Times Atkid LC Research/Media 3 Mon, Jul-08-02 03:05


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:32.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.