Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Mon, Jun-17-24, 12:32
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 27,328
 
Plan: Muscle Centric
Stats: 238/152/160 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 110%
Location: UK
Default In 'Good Energy,' a doctor lays out how to measure and boost your metabolic health

I thought I'd already posted here about Dr Casey Means book, Good Energy, but possibly it was only in my journal. Whatever, it's a book I can definitely recommend.


Quote:
In 'Good Energy,' a doctor lays out how to measure and boost your metabolic health

In medical school, Casey Means could tell that her own health was slipping.

The culprits? Crummy food, long days hunched over a desk and little sleep -- rites of passage for many future physicians.

“I was getting sore from sitting so much,” she recalls.

Hoping to make a small dent, she asked Stanford to add a few standing desks in the back of their classrooms. The administration shot down the idea, but told her they’d reconsider if she returned with convincing data.

Means tracked down grant funding, trained up in qualitative research and conducted an analysis of her classmates’ sentiments on the matter. “The data was overwhelming,” she says, “Students actually felt that the amount of sitting was diminishing their well-being and their learning.”

Two years later, Means presented her findings to the powers-that-be, only to hear that standing desks were still off the table. It was a lesson for the surgeon-to-be on the blindspots in the medical system and how prevention of chronic health problems falls by the wayside.

“That was just one of those first moments of realizing this was going to be a really big ship to turn,” says Means, who has a medical practice in Portland, Oregon and is chief medical officer for the biotech company Levels.

In her new book, Good Energy, Means lays out her thesis for what is wrong in U.S. health care and how patients can take their health into their own hands. She and her co author, Calley Means, her brother, delineate how common diseases and symptoms that plague Americans are rooted in issues like poor nutrition, lack of movement, and problems with sleep.

She links many of these chronic problems to troubles in our mitochondria, the powerhouses of our cells.

“The most foundational level of health is how our cells are powered,” says Means, “You could have a Ferrari and if it has no gas, it will not run. So ‘good energy’ is a term to help us understand what we're striving for when we're doing all these dietary and lifestyle investments.”

The book charts her path through the medical profession. She became disillusioned with medicine’s failure to adequately address the most pressing and pervasive causes of disease in our country. Ultimately she left surgery to practice functional medicine and eventually founded, Levels, which uses continuous glucose monitors to help people track their metabolic health.

She lays out concrete ways to assess and improve your own well-being -- including how to interpret different lab tests -- and offers plenty of extra context on biomarkers of health for those who want to go deeper.

This conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

We often hear about obesity being a public health crisis in America. You frame it slightly differently, saying that most of us have some form of “metabolic dysfunction.” What do you mean by that?

We're actually referencing a paper that came out of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology in 2022 that showed, based on assessment of the lab results of 55,000 Americans, only 6.8% were metabolically healthy – 93.2% had at least one biomarker indicating metabolic dysfunction. What the science is telling us is that most of the chronic symptoms and conditions that are affecting Americans across the lifespan are rooted in metabolic dysfunction, which is a core problem in how our bodies and our cells actually make energy to power themselves.

If we think of this as a visual, we're talking about the trunk of the tree of American health care being metabolic dysfunction and all the branches being the different symptoms and diseases that we're so familiar with, [including] Type 2 diabetes, obesity, Alzheimer’s, dementia, cancer, chronic kidney disease...

It seems like we’re hearing a lot about mitochondria these days, and their role in health, including in your book. Why is that central to this concept of good energy?

Yes, it's thrilling! Mitochondria are these miraculous parts of our cells that make energy. We have these 40-plus trillion cells in our bodies, and each of those cells is a little factory that is doing trillions of chemical reactions every second. Almost all of those chemical reactions need energy. A well-functioning mitochondria means a well-powered cell.

When we have mitochondrial dysfunction and we become underpowered, we end up getting dysfunction of our cells and [that] leads to dysfunctional organs and that is disease and symptoms. A big question people might have is why now all of a sudden are mitochondria under siege? And the reason is our environment has been changing at such a rapid pace over the last hundred years or so.

What are some of those changes?

Our food patterns, sleep, movement patterns, our emotional health and stress, our relationship with light, our relationship with temperature, and our relationship with toxins.

When we think about food, 70% of our calories are ultra-processed, industrially-manufactured, nutrient-depleted food with lots of synthetic additives, which are essentially under-nourishing our cells.

We are sleeping less. And it's not just quantity, the quality and consistency of our sleep is also problematic.

Americans are investing more than ever in exercise -- we actually have doubled fitness center memberships since the year 2000 -- and yet obesity continues to climb.

A big part of this, I believe, is we have taken movement out of the fabric of everyday life and then basically told people that exercise can replace that. But biochemically that's not true. A bout of exercise is very important for the body, but moving throughout the day in a low-grade way actually sends a stimulus to our cells to constantly dispose of glucose and use it throughout the day, which can have a profound impact on our metabolic health. So in a sense, our obsession with exercise while still being radically sedentary for most of the day, is not really working for us.

The book starts with the story of your mother who seems to have traveled a very common path in our health care system. Why focus on her?

My mom represents a typical American patient who is both totally loyal and dependent to the health care system, but ultimately let down by it, in the sense that she never fully healed and never was able to actually reverse any of the conditions. Instead of being healed, she was being managed.

What exactly do you mean by that?

My mother had me when she was about 40, and I was a very large baby. I was close to 12 pounds, which portends metabolic issues in both the child and the mother. No one really alerted her that it was a warning sign.

As she moved into her 50s and 60s, she racked up high cholesterol, high blood pressure, high blood sugar. Americans are facing these at astronomical rates. All three of these are rooted in these same things -- insulin resistance and metabolic dysfunction. They’re what I call the trifecta of bad energy in the book.

Then she's 72 and she has some pain in her belly. Turns out she has stage 4 widely metastatic pancreatic cancer. Thirteen days later, she died. When we look at cancer, which we're really starting to understand more as a very metabolically interlinked disease, it's no surprise that cancer rates are going up dramatically.

So from the time when she had a large baby to when she started racking up metabolic syndrome criteria -- high cholesterol, high blood pressure, high blood sugar -- all the way to cancer, she was on a spectrum of essentially the same problem.

What are some of the ways the health care system fails to address metabolic health – and ultimately misses opportunities to prevent chronic disease?

The stark economic reality of our current paradigm is that the health care system makes more money when patients are sick, and it makes less money when patients are healthy. What that does, unfortunately, is create an invisible hand that guides every aspect of how we look at disease, how we look at the body, how we pursue research. Every single doctor I know is a very good person who went into health care to help people. But that simple financial reality creates an entire system designed to make us blind to root causes.

We've convinced people and doctors that innovation and specialization equates to progress when, in fact, the reality is that a connected and far simpler approach focused on the right issues that are leading to most diseases would be a lot cheaper and a lot easier. But it's not currently incentivized.

It’s easy to get pretty cynical when you discuss these incentives to keep us sick. What do you want people to take away from that? Are you worried this could lead to a wholesale rejection of medicine?

Our health care system has produced miracles; where it shines is in the management of acute issues. Whenever I speak about metabolic health, we're talking about chronic symptoms and diseases. Obviously for a severe infection, a pill, an antibiotic, or a shot is a great approach. We've asked people to take that approach and apply it to lifestyle-based diseases, where the fix that's being recommended is not ameliorating the cause.

I actually have great optimism for the future. We know that, when people understand the severity of an issue, collective will can be monumental. We saw this during COVID. People came together and rapidly changed the entire fabric of society to address this problem. I'm just trying to name the problem that we are dealing with and to help people understand where we need to focus the arrow.

Your book is filled with lots of granular information on how to assess your own health and make changes. What are a few really simple steps people can do right away?

Step one is to understand your basic metabolic biomarkers that you can get at your annual physical with your doctor: fasting glucose, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, hemoglobin A1C, waist circumference and blood pressure.

Step two starts with food. In just six weeks of eating unprocessed, whole foods, we can transform our biomarkers. I would say ignore the dietary dogma and just focus on the highest quality food you can get. You're going to be loading your body with nutrients, and the body knows exactly what to do with those nutrients.

Try that for six weeks and try walking at least 7,000 steps a day, ideally 10,000 or more steps a day, by just setting a timer on your phone for every 30 or 45 minutes and taking a walk around the block. Build it into the everyday fabric of your life. And then after six weeks to two months, recheck your biomarkers.

The core message of your book seems to be an appeal to common sense. It doesn’t seem like you are taking just one side in the nutrition or exercise debates, beyond emphasizing more movement and eating quality whole food. Is that right?

This is a controversial statement, but I feel comfortable saying it; you don't need to trust any health influencers. You don't even need to trust your doctor. You actually can trust yourself.

People can distort that statement to say, ‘oh, does this mean we shouldn't go to the doctor?’ No. What I'm saying is that by understanding a few of our very basic biomarkers and slowing down enough to actually be able to interpret the symptoms, we can know if we are moving in the right direction or not. That is not something we've traditionally empowered people to do. And I think that we need to normalize that.

https://www.npr.org/sections/shots-...th-mitochondria
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Mon, Jun-17-24, 13:21
JEY100's Avatar
JEY100 JEY100 is online now
Posts: 13,756
 
Plan: P:E/DDF
Stats: 225/150/169 Female 5' 9"
BF:45%/28%/25%
Progress: 134%
Location: NC
Default

I posted the NPR article in my journal on Friday, but it really does need its own thread. There is so much good information in the book, from the basic 5 free tests to the overkill full functional medical panel. https://forum.lowcarber.org/showpos...7&postcount=394

I have also posted some podcasts and the book link in the General Low Carb thread on new books. https://forum.lowcarber.org/showthr...359#post9463359

Dr Naiman on X this morning, indirectly a response to recents comments about tracking.
Quote:
SECRET CONFESSION:

I ❤️ waist-to-height ratio!

Could probably replace half the lab tests that I order as a physician.

Very powerful. 💥👊🏽💥
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Tue, Jun-18-24, 01:24
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 27,328
 
Plan: Muscle Centric
Stats: 238/152/160 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 110%
Location: UK
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JEY100
I posted the NPR article in my journal on Friday, but it really does need its own thread. There is so much good information in the book, from the basic 5 free tests to the overkill full functional medical panel. https://forum.lowcarber.org/showpos...7&postcount=394

I have also posted some podcasts and the book link in the General Low Carb thread on new books. https://forum.lowcarber.org/showthr...359#post9463359
Thanks Janet! It was obviously the book link I was thinking of and not something I'd posted myself, other than in my journal.

... and yes, a separate thread is a very good idea
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Tue, Jun-18-24, 02:24
JEY100's Avatar
JEY100 JEY100 is online now
Posts: 13,756
 
Plan: P:E/DDF
Stats: 225/150/169 Female 5' 9"
BF:45%/28%/25%
Progress: 134%
Location: NC
Default

When you hear 93% of Americans are metabolically unhealthy, it is from this large UNC Health study using the basic tests available from most health records.

Step one is to meet the basic metrics established by UNC for their study on metabolic syndrome. Are you in the 6.8% of Americans who are considered metabolically healthy?

1. fasting glucose less than 100 mg/dL
2. triglycerides less than 150 mg/dL
3. HDL is above 40 mg/dL for men or above 50 for women
4. Waist circumference is less than 40 inches for men and less than 35 inches for women
5. Blood pressure is less than 120/80 mmHG

Dr Means and her company would use stricter numbers (e.g. Trigs under 80 ) and have many other metrics you can follow, but these are what you can usually obtain free in an annual physical and indicate basic good health.
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Today, 03:35
JEY100's Avatar
JEY100 JEY100 is online now
Posts: 13,756
 
Plan: P:E/DDF
Stats: 225/150/169 Female 5' 9"
BF:45%/28%/25%
Progress: 134%
Location: NC
Default

In the current Optimising Nutrition Macros class, some members are comparing their personalized nutrition profile using this simple chart from the Good Energy book. It aligns well with the lower carb doctors and nutrition experts who in addition to a higher protein percent, now correct and avoid nutrient deficiencies with a food list similar to Dr Means. Eat at least one item from each category, preferably one item at each meal.

Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Today, 08:04
Calianna's Avatar
Calianna Calianna is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,191
 
Plan: Atkins-ish (hypoglycemia)
Stats: 000/000/000 Female 63
BF:
Progress: 50%
Default

I know this is way off this thread's main topic of boosting metabolic health, but this part struck me:

Quote:
“I was getting sore from sitting so much,” she recalls.

Hoping to make a small dent, she asked Stanford to add a few standing desks in the back of their classrooms. The administration shot down the idea, but told her they’d reconsider if she returned with convincing data.


Providing adjustable desks would have probably been a good thing, but desks that are only for standing? Probably not a good idea.

Several years ago, there were offices that converted 100% to standing only desks. No sitting while at work. No place to sit all day long. The research supposedly showed that it improved worker's efficiency and such.

The problem is that standing all day every day to work turned out to be very hard on the workers joints, as well as causing blood and fluid to pool in the lower extremities, varicose veins, leg pain, back and neck pain, and cardiovascular problems.

I can certainly verify just how hard it is on a body to stand all day every day - working at a grocery store where I was given no choice but to stand all day every day, and it was indeed very hard on me physically. If you're normal weight, it's still bad - worse for someone who is overweight or obese, because of the additional pressure on all the joints and back, and even worse if you already have health issues. (In retail, at least in the US, sitting at all is considered a sign of laziness... never mind that Aldi cashiers always sit while scanning groceries - and they're the fastest cashiers ever.)

She's very right about needing to get up and move throughout the day though. It's just as unnatural to sit in one spot all day long as it is to stand all day long. And I don't think either extreme is good for metabolic health - or health in general.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 13:27.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.