Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > Low-Carb War Zone
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5   ^
Old Today, 03:08
JEY100's Avatar
JEY100 JEY100 is online now
Posts: 13,751
 
Plan: P:E/DDF
Stats: 225/150/169 Female 5' 9"
BF:45%/28%/25%
Progress: 134%
Location: NC
Default

Doreen, The Banting diet analysis by Dr Catherine Champagne was done in 1993, for the article in "Classics in Obesity" by Dr George Bray. He reviewed 10 Banting editions but used the third edition. It was the one printed for a modest price and many copies are available. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi....1993.tb00604.x. I didn’t know about Barry Groves later review, thank you for pointing to it.

This new two year study used four eating patterns, and similar in result to Christopher Gardner's one year LC vs LF DietFit Study. At the end of the largest and longest two-year trial on diet and weight loss, the researchers found that the members of each diet group lost a similar amount of weight, averaging about 6.6 to eight pounds. There will be individual differences, some will do better on LC than HC, some on VLC, but there is no "ideal" diet for everyone. These six nutrition and lifestyle tips can be added to any diet.

"They ate more protein.
People who significantly increased the amount of protein they ate lost much more weight than people who did not. By the end of the trial, the high-protein consumers had lost an average of 16.5 pounds – triple the amount that people in the lowest protein group lost.
The reasons? Eating more protein is thermogenic. Our bodies spend a lot of calories digesting and absorbing protein compared with fat and carbs. Protein also increases satiety. When you increase your protein intake, you end up consuming less food, said George A. Bray, a co-author of the study and emeritus director of the Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Louisiana."
​
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:44.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.