View Single Post
  #3   ^
Old Tue, Sep-03-24, 02:50
JEY100's Avatar
JEY100 JEY100 is online now
Posts: 13,753
 
Plan: P:E/DDF
Stats: 225/150/169 Female 5' 9"
BF:45%/28%/25%
Progress: 134%
Location: NC
Default

Why can’t it be both?

Haven’t we beaten this dead horse enough by now? I thought 2021 was end of dietary dogma. Carbs, insulin, and obesity: Is the carbohydrate-insulin model dead or alive?

https://www.dietdoctor.com/carbs-in...l-dead-or-alive

The CIM is proved wrong everyday by the "black swans" walking around under 15% body fat who do eat a significant percentage of carbs in their diet. ..almost every endurance athlete, body builder and most everyone who follows a dietary pattern that increases satiety and decreases caloric intake. There are more people who successfully manage their metabolic health and weight through some version of energy balance than carb restriction.

Quote:
So what can we make of all the controversy?

Insulin plays a role in weight gain and weight loss, but it may not be the same role in both situations.

Chronic hyperinsulinemia likely plays a larger role in obesity than short-term post-meal insulin rises.

CIM does not describe the only manner in which we gain and lose weight and is not the only mechanism by which low-carb diets work.

In addition to lowering insulin, low-carb diets help with healthy weight loss by:

Reducing highly processed and high- sugar foods that may cause cravings and stimulate overeating

Naturally reducing caloric intake through improved satiety

Increasing protein intake

Allowing only high-quality, high-fiber carbs

Other dietary patterns that achieve these same goals will likely also result in sustainable weight loss.

Is CIM dead or alive?

Does it matter?
Reply With Quote