Fri, Sep-13-02, 08:22
|
Senior Member
Posts: 134
|
|
Plan: atkins
Stats: 325/243/150
BF:
Progress: 47%
Location: Seattle
|
|
Isn't sugar an anti-nutrient?
It's been awhile so I can't quote precisely but I have read, in several articles, that the human body has to use vital nutrients to absorb sugar. This means sugar depletes nutrients. How can a nutrient depleter be a vital nutrient?
I can accept the debate about the effectiveness of low carbing but I can scarcely believe the NIH thinks sugar belongs on any diet.
Yuck. It can be a puzzling world, eh?
|