View Single Post
  #1   ^
Old Thu, Jun-24-04, 15:16
agd agd is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 35
 
Plan: n/a
Stats: 150/129/? Male growing (5'4-5'5?)
BF:
Progress:
Default Advantages of low-carb diets over the "John Stone approach"?

Hello,

I've taken an active role in helping my overweight mother try to lose the weight. She's seen friends who have had success with South Beach, and my brother did lose some weight for a short amount of time with Atkins.

I've been trying to get her use the "John Stone approach" (I don't really have a name for this, but it might be similar to the Body-For-Life approach). John Stone's website helped me find a *healthy* approach to dieting that has helped me successfully lose 20 pounds. Keep in mind that while I am a 15-year-old, and my metabolism may be giving me a boost, I managed to lose it without feeling hungry.

This site also summarizes it pretty well. I can't call it "high protein" or "low carb" -- simply put, it's just healthy and balanced. And even though some people think diets stunt teens' growth, I am certainly getting a lot more nutrients this way than with my previous garbage diet.

But I digress. I want to know what you guys and girls think the advantages of low-carbing are with respect to the other approach. Keep in mind that on that diet, one does not eat "bad carbs" (they're all GI except for post-work out carbs), just much more than you all do.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links