Don't know about the bra sizes Meeker, but the other study "suggested" it was the saturated FAT in the meat, and not meat itself. It's worth noting the timing of the release of this article ... The "study" back in October ... was originally posted to AOL the day before it appeared on Reuter's Health e-line ... and the AOL report also said it was MEAT, whereas the Reuter's report stated it was FAT.

I think it's false, biased and misleading either way.

Doreen