View Single Post
  #8   ^
Old Thu, Feb-19-04, 08:11
kyrasdad's Avatar
kyrasdad kyrasdad is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 3,060
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 338/253/210 Male 5'11"
BF:
Progress: 66%
Location: Broken Arrow, Oklahoma
Default

They'll put more poor people on more fattening pastas, bread and rice than ever before. They will have the exact opposite effect they intended.

What a terrible idea. I have no idea what they already tax in Great Britain; do they tax sugary products already?

I wouldn't mind such a tax at all on stuff like Oreos and Twinkies that have no nutritional value at all. After all, at least in the U.S., we tax tobacco and booze at a high rate. I can't see why not true junk food.

Putting extra tax burden on whole foods just makes no sense, will harm the poor, and will harm farmers while enriching food processing giants.

A long time ago, I read a short story that had quasi-fascist government monitors who looked in on families to see who was fat, who smoked, etc. We may just get to that yet if things keep going the way they are.
Reply With Quote