Tue, Feb-17-04, 18:59
|
Senior Member
Posts: 606
|
|
Plan: PP
Stats: 210/170/170
BF:
Progress: 100%
Location: NJ
|
|
1. Sounds like he designed and interpreted a study to find what he wanted to find. Everything else is speculation.
2. 15% less likely? Out of a total of 95 colorectal cancer cases? From a universe of 10,000 people, followed for 17 years? Miniscule effect, impossible to draw ANYTHING from that. Besides, why only 15% less risk? If a vegan diet is so perfect,
3. It was based on what people SAID they ate. Not anything they measured or observed.
4. Sounds like he designed and interpreted a study to find what he wanted to find. See a lot of this nowadays.
|