bv, here is my take on the cause of cancer, and the cause of most diseases.

first we need to define "cause". let's say that "B" causes cancer. we have positive evidence of a direct link, in that we know how "B" reacts directly with the cells, to cause cancer to grow.

but then we also find that in order to have "B" present, we must have "A". without "A", there can be no "B". so does "A" cause cancer or does "B" cause cancer ? well the american cancer society is never gonna find "B", for then they would be out of a job. but in my opinion, we already know what "A" is - "an out-of-balance-body", because of which is no longer working as designed. the longer "A" exists, the more disease processes are allowed to build up, until kablamo, we got a cancer growth, or whatever. this is why i am so persistent on getting these tests, and keeping one's body in balance, SO THAT IT CAN WORK AS IT WAS DESIGNED.