Active Low-Carber Forums

Active Low-Carber Forums (http://forum.lowcarber.org/index.php)
-   Low-Carb War Zone (http://forum.lowcarber.org/forumdisplay.php?f=137)
-   -   Low carb eating damages arteries - BBC (http://forum.lowcarber.org/showthread.php?t=400625)

tomsey Mon, Aug-24-09 18:38

Low carb eating damages arteries - BBC
 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8218780.stm

Lead researcher Anthony Rosenzweig said the findings were so concerning to him that he decided to come off the low-carb diet he was following.

tomsey Mon, Aug-24-09 18:51

http://www.physorg.com/news170346116.html


Quote:
Low-carb diets linked to atherosclerosis and impaired blood vessel growth

August 24th, 2009 by Bonnie Prescott

"It’s very difficult to know in clinical studies how diets affect vascular health,” said senior author Anthony Rosenzweig, a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School (HMS) and director of cardiovascular research in BIDMC’s CardioVascular Institute. Photograph by Justin Ide/Harvard News Office

(PhysOrg.com) -- Even as low-carbohydrate/high-protein diets have proven successful at helping individuals rapidly lose weight, little is known about the diets' long-term effects on vascular health.


Now, a study led by a scientific team at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) provides some of the first data on this subject, demonstrating that mice placed on a 12-week low carbohydrate/high-protein diet showed a significant increase in atherosclerosis, a buildup of plaque in the heart's arteries and a leading cause of heart attack and stroke. The findings also showed that the diet led to an impaired ability to form new blood vessels in tissues deprived of blood flow, as might occur during a heart attack.

Described in today's Online Version of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), the study also found that standard markers of cardiovascular risk, including cholesterol, were not changed in the animals fed the low-carb diet, despite the clear evidence of increased vascular disease.

"It's very difficult to know in clinical studies how diets affect vascular health," says senior author Anthony Rosenzweig, MD, Director of Cardiovascular Research in BIDMC's CardioVascular Institute and Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School. "We, therefore, tend to rely on easily measured serum markers [such as cholesterol], which have been surprisingly reassuring in individuals on low-carbohydrate/high-protein diets, who do typically lose weight. But our research suggests that, at least in animals, these diets could be having adverse cardiovascular effects that are not reflected in simple serum markers."

Rosenzweig and his coauthors found that the increase in plaque build-up in the blood vessels and the impaired ability to form new vessels were associated with a reduction in vascular progenitor cells, which some hypothesize could play a protective role in maintaining vascular health.

"A causal role for these cells has not yet been proven, but this new data is consistent with the idea that injurious stimuli may be counterbalanced by the body's restorative capacity," he explains. "This may be the mechanism behind the adverse vascular effects we found in mice that were fed the low-carb diets."


The study's first author Shi Yin Foo, MD, PhD, a clinical cardiologist in the Rosenzweig laboratory at BIDMC, first embarked on this investigation after seeing heart-attack patients who were on these diets - and after observing Rosenzweig himself following a low-carbohydrate regimen.

"Over lunch, I'd ask Tony how he could eat that food and would tell him about the last low-carb patient I'd admitted to the hospital," says Foo. "Tony would counter by noting that there were no controls for my observations."

"Finally," adds Rosenzweig, "I asked Shi Yin to do the mouse experiment - so that we could know what happens in the blood vessels and so that I could eat in peace."

The investigators proceeded to study a mouse model of atherosclerosis. These "ApoE" mice were fed one of three diets: a standard diet of mouse "chow" (65 percent carbohydrate; 15 percent fat; 20 percent protein); a "Western diet" in keeping with the average human diet (43 percent carbohydrate; 42 percent fat; 15 percent protein; and 0.15 percent cholesterol); or a low-carb/high-protein diet (12 percent carbohydrate; 43 percent fat; 45 percent protein; and 0.15 percent cholesterol).

"We had a diet specially made that would mimic a typical low-carb diet," explains Foo. "In order to keep the calorie count the same in all three diets, we had to substitute a nutrient to replace the carbohydrates. We decided to substitute protein because that is what people typically do when they are on these diets."

The scientists then observed the mice after six weeks, and again at 12 weeks. Consistent with experience in humans, the mice fed the low-carb diet gained 28 percent less weight than the mice fed the Western diet. However, further probing revealed that the animals' blood vessels exhibited a significantly greater degree of atherosclerosis, as measured by plaque accumulation: 15.3 percent compared with 8.8 percent among the Western diet group. (As expected, the mice on the chow diet showed minimal evidence of atherosclerosis compared with either of the other two groups.)

"Our next question was, 'Why do the low-carb mice have such an increase in atherosclerosis?'" says Foo. Searching for an explanation, she and her coauthors proceeded to measure the usual markers thought to contribute to vascular disease, including the animals' cholesterol and triglyceride levels, oxidative stress, insulin and glucose, as well as levels of some inflammatory cytokines.

"In each case, there was either no difference in measurements compared with the mice on the Western Diet [which contains the same amount of fat and cholesterol] or the numbers slightly favored the low-carb cohort," she adds. "None of these results explained why the animals' blood had more atherosclerotic blockages and looked so bad."

Since there was no difference in the noxious or inflammatory stimuli that the animals' blood vessels were exposed to, Foo wondered whether the restorative capacity of the animals might be contributing to the difference. The investigators, therefore, looked at the animals' endothelial or vascular progenitor cell (EPC) counts. Derived from bone marrow, the EPC cells may play a role in vessel regrowth and repair following injury.

"Examinations of the animals' bone marrow and peripheral blood showed that the measures of EPC cells dropped fully 40 percent among the mice on the low-carb diet - after only two weeks," says Rosenzweig. "Although the precise nature and role of these cells is still being worked out - and caution is always warranted in extrapolating from effects in mice to a clinical situation - these results succeeded in getting me off the low-carb diet."

Even more important, he notes, the findings point out that there can be a disconnect between weight loss or serum markers and vascular health, and that vascular health can be affected by macronutrients other than fat and cholesterol - in this case, protein and carbohydrates.

"Understanding the mechanisms responsible for these effects, as well as the potential restorative capacity that may counteract vascular disease, could ultimately help guide doctors in advising their patients," adds Rosenzweig. "This issue is particularly important given the growing epidemic of obesity and its adverse consequences. For now, it appears that a moderate and balanced diet, coupled with regular exercise, is probably best for most people."

Source: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Nancy LC Mon, Aug-24-09 19:40

This reminds me of feeding rabbits a bunch of fat and deciding that athrosclerosis was caused by cholesterol. It is... in rabbits.

Gypsybyrd Mon, Aug-24-09 19:46

The added protein to replace carbs because that's what "most people add." Not necessarily true. I added more fat.

They used mice. Mice are not humans. And, if memory serves, mice don't eat a lot of protein or fat in their natural habitat. Of course, I could be wrong about that.

I'm not going off low carb because of this "study."

Ritko1 Mon, Aug-24-09 19:49

Aren't mice mostly herbivores?

This kinda reminds me of the study that was done on the rabbits that are herbivores. They fed them a high meat, high fat diet then found the rabbits were having adverse affects. Well of course they would, they are not supposed to eat meat.

This then lead them to declare that people, who are omnivores, should not eat a high fat, high protein diet as well.

tomsey Mon, Aug-24-09 19:57

Nope, they are omnivoes.

http://cfhs.ca/wild/mice_and_rats/


Quote:
Mice are omnivores and will eat a variety of things. They seem to prefer cereals, seeds and nuts but also like foods high in fat and protein such as butter, bacon, meat and sweets
.

Ritko1 Mon, Aug-24-09 20:01

Hmmmm.......

I guess it would depend on which kind of mice they used.

http://www.ehow.com/about_4644660_what-do-mice-eat.html

tomsey Mon, Aug-24-09 20:06

This should lead to some more interesting studies.

Rheneas Tue, Aug-25-09 02:38

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ritko1
Hmmmm.......

I guess it would depend on which kind of mice they used.



They used mice that were specially bred so that they laid down plaques faster than normal

Quote:
The study used mice specially bred to be vulnerable to the build up of fatty deposits in arteries


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...l#ixzz0PBLt8xPZ

our most fanatical health (cancer) obsessed daily rag.

Merpig Tue, Aug-25-09 06:22

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nancy LC
This reminds me of feeding rabbits a bunch of fat and deciding that athrosclerosis was caused by cholesterol. It is... in rabbits.


And does anyone know what the actual composition of the diet was? Not merely its percentages of fat, carb and protein. But what *were* the fats? Vegetable oils maybe?

tomsey Tue, Aug-25-09 06:32

The fats, type and quantity, were the same in both the western diet and low carb diet.

What seems to have made the difference in terms of marked blood vessel derangement was the increase in protein and reduction in carbs in the low carb diet.

tomsey Tue, Aug-25-09 06:51

Here is where it was published:

http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2...995106.abstract

Merpig Tue, Aug-25-09 06:59

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomsey
What seems to have made the difference in terms of marked blood vessel derangement was the increase in protein and reduction in carbs in the low carb diet.


But was it both? Or just one or the other? For example, my daily protein intake is about 15-20% of my daily calorie requirements - the same amount as the standard "mouse chow" diet or the standard "Western" diet. I seriously doubt I could ever eat 45% protein. As Gypsybyrd also said, I didn't increase my protein when I went LC. If anything I think I decreased my protein. It's fat that I increased.

tomsey Tue, Aug-25-09 07:12

I suspect it is the protein.

The SAD diet is high in protein and low carb diets, as eaten by most, are usually even higher in protein. Most low carb diets recommend between 30-40% protein.

black57 Tue, Aug-25-09 08:26

The researchers don't need rats, all they have to do is come to my houes...we ate all our rats in a stew. They can check our arteries and the cholesterol of my family here at 400 blah, blah blah blvd., in California. :bash: They can see all the meats, fats and otehr unhealthy goo they need to prove to the world that we low carbers are healthy. Ughhhh, this just p*sses me off.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 14:32.

Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.